Kavanaugh Wants to Testify, Dems Say “Delay”


Both Judge Kavanaugh and Professor Blasey say they will testify under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Democrats are calling for the testimony to be delayed. Why? So she can suddenly be too traumatized to testify after the election? Just wanted to throw that out there. Maybe she is telling the truth, in which case, she can testify this week.

Another interesting fact turned up about the past they do share.

Democrat Christine Blasey Ford accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of attempting to rape her when he was a junior in high school. She feared for her life, she claims, but she did not see the need to make this information public until immediately before the confirmation of the Judge.

Judge Kavanaugh wants to testify to the Senate Judiciary Committee and the accuser has agreed to do so as well, according to her #MeToo attorney.


“This is a completely false allegation,” Kavanaugh said. “I have never done anything like what the accuser describes—to her or to anyone,” Kavanaugh said. “Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday.”

“I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”

White House counsel Kellyanne Conway said earlier today on Fox & Friends that they both should testify.


Thousands of leftists got the email, probably from MoveOn among others, to sign a petition to delay the confirmations vote.

Democrats sat on this for two months, and the accuser sat on it for 36 years, but it’s too soon?

It couldn’t be that any time before November is too soon for Democrats who said they would do anything to stop this confirmation?

There is something else. She deleted her social media accounts and they need to be subpoenaed along with the family’s bank accounts.

Update: The story about the Kavanaugh family and the Blasey family having ties over a foreclosure has been questioned. We removed that section of the story.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
3 years ago

I do have some cursory experience with FBI background checks. An agent once came to the door in an investigation into a neighbor. They asked if any details of the person in question would be viewed in a negative light. Therefore if a low-level person would be investigated in their early life why wouldn’t a person in high office not be thoroughly vetted.

3 years ago

One statement sounds inescapably suspicious. ‘I thought he might “inadvertently” kill me’. Inadvertent is a word that doesn’t strike me as one that would fit with the charge.

3 years ago

First, I think this woman’s story is just that: A STORY! She’s lying through her teeth. That she’s got a history of being not normal is proved by comments made by her students in years before this vicious smear-job ever reared its lying head:


Anyone ask her why she went into a bedroom alone with two boys she said were drunk? Why would she do something like that? Was that common practice for her?

3 years ago

There were also some disturbing comments on the Rate your Professor site that calls her into question. The earlier ones were more favorable whereas the later ones were more damning.