Seymour Hersh published a report this week claiming the US blew up Nord Stream with the help of Norway. Though the report has enough gaps to question it, it’s not difficult to believe. But it is a story, not a report with evidence.
However, Victoria Nuland basically boasted about it.
Western security agencies directed their media corporations to tell their populations that Russia blew up its own pipeline. Those media outlets obeyed, as always.
And now Victoria Nuland just all but openly boasts with Ted Cruz about how proud they are that they destroyed it: https://t.co/zfjeu26C9b
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 9, 2023
Russia is now asking for an international investigation.
Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov
Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov responded to the report by investigative journalist Seymour Hersh by stressing that it should spur attempts to find out what happened.
Articles such as the one by Hersh show “the need for an open international investigation into this unprecedented attack on this critical infrastructure,” Peskov told the media on Thursday. “It’s impossible to leave this without finding the perpetrators and punishing them.”
Russia has already spoken about data that “points to the involvement of the Anglo-Saxons [the US and the UK]” in this incident, and there is “certain overlapping” between this information and the report by the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, the Kremlin spokesman said.
Peskov argued that although Hersh’s journalistic investigation cannot be viewed as source material, “it’s a very important piece, which… must provoke the acceleration of the international probe. But we, on the contrary, witness attempts to silently wind down such international investigation.”
Acoording to The Grayzone
Aaron Mate of The Grayzone believes Peskov has a case and explained to Tucker that the US has a motive, having long tried to stop Nord Stream 2. Mate believes Nord Stream stood in the way of the US proxy war with Russia.
While the US was allegedly planning the destruction of Nord Stream, Russia was amassing troops on the border of Ukraine. Russia also presented peace deals to the US and NATO.
They wanted NATO off their borders. The US wouldn’t even discuss the issue of Ukraine not joining NATO. Instead, the US let the invasion take place. They then began this operation to blow up Nord Stream 2. The day after it was blown up, Antony Blinken declared it an enormous “strategic opportunity.” Victoria Nuland was grateful Nord Stream is a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea.
Watch:
So one NATO partner,Norway, helps another NATO partner,USA, to blow up the pipeline of NATO partner Germany
That is called an “alliance”🤔
I wonder if Germany will invoke Article 5 of the NATO chapter?
An attack against one is an attack on all members.That would be hilarious. pic.twitter.com/hWSimwHUqp
— Richard (@ricwe123) February 9, 2023
MonkeyWerx has some corroborating data.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
It’s clear that the US had the most to gain. In the end, I think Traitor Joe will actually accomplish something that President Trump couldn’t – America being thrown out of NATO! Europe is not going to follow Traitor Joe into a All Out and potentially Nuclear War with Russia!
Without a reliable energy source, Europe is going to fail. But then, so is the United States. Liberals, Democrats, and especially Traitor Joe are dangerous to the World.
As a Demon Rat senator once when referring to a republican President ( The evidence is not important its the magnitude of the accusations. Yes the US did it i know some of the players.
AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST A COUNTRY THAT WE HAVE NOT DECLARED WAR AGAINST??? AND WHO AUTHORIZED THE SEIZING OF RUSSIAN CITIZENS PRIVATE PROPERTY ??? THE ONLY TIMES THAT IS ALLOWED IS DURING TIMES OF DECLARED WAR, CONGRESS CAN THEN ISSUE “LETTERS OF MARQUE” AUTHORIZING THE SEIZURE OF PROPERTY ON THE HIGH SEAS. CONGRESS HAS NOT DECLARED WAR ON ANYONE SINCE WW2.
Do you think that your rambling and incorrect argument has more strength because it is in all caps?
The demolition of a valuable pipeline owned by Russia and Germany is terrorism, an act of war, and a big escalation. I cannot support the USA.
But, they only damaged 3 of the 4 lines,
Not damaged – DESTROYED, they are now unusble scrap at the bottom of the North Sea.
Interesting is how countries in the area responded; from no comment to the information being classified. One would assume those countries are fully aware of who was the culprit.