Latest hearing lies! Republicans shred the media, rip the bribery claim


Rep. Nunes shredded the media in his opening statement. He called them “puppets of the Democrat Party.” That is absolutely true.

Rep. Ratcliffe ripped Democrats over the claims that the President is guilty of bribery with 3500 pages of documents and not one word of bribery except once in relation to Joe Biden. They came up with the idea of ‘bribery’ as the crime when they saw the polling.


Vindman testified under oath in Tuesday’s impeachment hearing before the House Intelligence Committee that the omission of the word “Burisma” was not “significant.” Democrats keep making a point of it.

Vindman also testified Tuesday that storing the transcript in a secure server was not unusual.

“Why would it be put on a separate secure system?” Vindman was asked.

“This is definitely not unprecedented,” he said. “At times, if you want to limit access to a smaller group of folks you put it on the secure system to ensure that a smaller group of people with access to the secure system have it.”

Democrats keep making a point of that.

He also said he never used the word ‘bribery’ in relation to the President and the transcript was accurate.

Both of those are talking points.


Looks like there is a lie in the next clip. Vindman might have spoken to the whistleblower. Schiff probably knows who the whistleblower is since he shut this down.

Rep. Zeldin tweeted: “If Adam Schiff & LTC Vindman don’t know who the “whistleblower” is, how would they know that naming the one person LTC Vindman spoke to in the intelligence community would out the “whistleblower?” That tweet is now viral. [There are about 500 bureaucrats in the NSC and he can’t name one? Unless of course, it’s the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella.]

Rep. Jordan made a point of the potential lie.

Jordan addressed Schiff who ignored him: “Mr. Chairman, I don’t see how this is outing the whistleblower? The witness has testified in his deposition that he doesn’t know who the whistleblower is. You have said, even though no one believes you, you have said that you don’t know who the whistleblower is. So, how is this outing the whistleblower to find out who this whistleblower is?”

Rep. Ratcliffe also explored the word ‘demand’ that Vindman is so fond of using:


Vindman admitted that the opening statement that he prepared, in which he claimed to be the “principal adviser to the President on Ukraine,” was false.

He was forced to admit earlier today that he has never spoken to President Donald Trump, not even once.

He also didn’t follow the chain of command as he said. Dr. Wienstrup got that out of him. Vindman didn’t use the word ‘demand’ as he first indicated in his opening statement on Tuesday. ‘Demand’ as in the President demanding President Zelensky investigate the Bidens and the election of 2016.

Vindman was unhappy that the President didn’t stick to his talking points. Well, let’s impeach him then.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments