Law School Bans Debate Because Conservative Viewpoints Might Be Too “Painful”


The dean of Seattle University’s law school revoked the school’s scholarship of a Federalist Society event, arguing it could be “harmful” to minority students to hear a conservative viewpoint, Free Beacon reported.

Seattle University School of Law

They hold Social Justice Mondays however, even though it must be “painful” for non-SJWs.

The Federalist Society, a national organization that promotes originalism in the context of constitutional interpretation, was to hold a debate on illegal immigration.

The petition against it only netted 200 signatures but was successful.

“We refuse to sit by and let hateful xenophobic and anti-immigrant rhetoric be a part of the culture/message/speech of Seattle University School of Law and Seattle University as a whole,” the petition originally read.

The petition had “been up for about a week” and initially contained a big, long diatribe about how the Federalist Society is a xenophobic organization.

They didn’t want the illegal aliens upset or “harmed”.

The law school dean apologized for not consulting with illegal aliens first to see if they were okay with a debate on illegal immigration.

Law school Dean Annette Clark wrote in part: The school “miscalculated and erred,” Clark said, saying that the Access to Justice Institute should have asked “marginalized” students [illegal aliens] their thoughts before sponsoring the event.

We have to ask the illegal aliens if it’s okay to debate illegal immigration???

The Orwellian leftists in charge of the media are turning the truth into lies and lies into truth. The article linked in the tweet below, which WaPo thinks is a legitimate ‘Democratic Perspective’, was written by the insane Drexel Professor George Ciccarello-Maher who hopes for white genocide.

Yesterday, I received an email from Marsha Blackburn in which she wrote that her video announcement ad about her legislative accomplishments was banned by Twitter because it mentioned stopping the “sale of baby body parts”. The ad was called “inflammatory” and “negative”.

My website articles are often not being shared on Facebook because of censorship, along with The Daily Signal and American Thinker.


Google made me remove an ad listing statistics on crimes by ethnicity as “too sexual”. No sex anything was mentioned in the article.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Flotmorton P. Gildersleeve
Flotmorton P. Gildersleeve
6 years ago

THIS MEANS IF you write an essay answer on the Washington State Bar Exam which states a different philosophy from the Bar Exam Grader, (who may be a disciple of this Law School “Dean”), you will fail; the question and perhaps fail the exam.
OR, ……..If you are a judge who hurts the lawyers “feelings” when you are “overruled” on an evidence issue, during a trial, may immediately be granted a recess to go grab your kleenix and “HAVE A GOOD CRY”….. and later file a complaint against the judge for hurting your feelings,………
Are you kidding me??? REALLY, ?? LAW SCHOOL “DEAN”???
HAr, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, ….STOP YER KILLING ME!!@ har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har.
Law School “Dean”,……… Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har, Har
Some of these idiots have accidentally been appointed to the federal district court bench, OH MY!

Flotmorton P. Gildersleeve
Flotmorton P. Gildersleeve
6 years ago

The American Bar Association should and must revoke this “law” school’s certification as an approved law school graduating qualified graduates certified as passing the Bar to become lawyers.
“Who” in the Seattle “Bar” writes the constitutional law and criminal procedure essay questions for the Washington State Bar Exam???
“Who, Who, Who let the dogs out????
Are you kidding me??…….Really?? a Law School “DEAN” ???? Come on yer joshing me aren’t you??
What kind of lawyer limits “DEBATE” ?????? Come on, REALLY????

6 years ago

A LAW school … I live just north of Seattle. Seattle University is a Jesuit-run private college. Used to be top notch.

If potential lawyers cannot openly discuss and hear any and every viewpoint, my gosh, what are we putting into society?

Oh right … lawyers who will prosecute for offended feelings, pass laws against hurt feeling …

unbelievable … just unbelievable.