Lib Site Says It’s Time for Whites to Pay for Privilege with Equality Tax


In keeping with the liberal ideology of wallowing in identity politics, promoting anti-white racism, and looking for unearned handouts, a liberal website called calls for a tax on whites, especially white men. It would be 5% to start. The money would be handed over to non-whites annually.’s article is by an anonymous writer who insists whites are privileged and owe non-whites regular payments because all their success depends on non-whites.

The article begins by claiming U.S. tax policy does not reflect the economic disadvantage of non-whites.

Uh, what about welfare, child tax credits, food stamps, preferred status in jobs and colleges.

“The privileged should pay more…Let’s start at 5% as if centuries of subjugation could ever be righted by such a minuscule percentage,” the article demands.

The author decided whites can start by doling out: “$3,000 per minority household on an annual basis. While $3,000 could never rectify centuries of abuse, it could at least give minorities the financial tools to compete in a white, male-dominated society.”

This is their tax code:

  • Single Heterosexual Caucasian Males
  • Equality Tax: 5%
  • Single Heterosexual Caucasian Females
  • Equality Tax: 4.5%
  • Married Heterosexual Caucasian Family
  • Equality Tax: 4%
  • Non-cisgender Caucasian
  • Equality Tax: 3%

They said they won’t back down when the privileged become “enraged”.

White’s success is because of non-whites according to them: “They must understand that their economic success was only made possible by the blood and sweat of minorities.”

The anonymous author says if you are white but identify as a different race, you don’t have to pay the tax.

Rachel Dolezal will love it.

They just have to show proof of their new color. I guess a photo of whites in blackface like Dolezal did would work.

Martin Luther King Jr. is cringing from the grave. It is he who said: “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character…”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments