Update at the end
ORIGINAL WASHINGTON TIMES STORY
The Washington Times reports the cyber expert on the “red team” hired by MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell now says the key data underpinning the theory that China hacked the 2020 election unveiled at the Cyber Symposium is illegitimate.
Mr. Lindell said he had 37 terabytes of “irrefutable” evidence that hackers, who he said were backed by China, broke into election systems and switched votes in favor of President Biden.
The proof, he said, is visible in intercepted network data or “packet captures” that were collected by hackers and could be unencrypted to reveal that a cyberattack occurred and that votes were switched.
Josh Merritt is an expert on the cyber team hired by Mr. Lindell to examine the data for the symposium. Unfortunately, he told The Washington Times that packet captures are unrecoverable in the data and that the data, as provided, cannot prove a cyber incursion by China.
On the second day of the symposium, Mr. Merritt said the team can’t say it is “legitimate if we don’t have confidence in the information.”
Mr. Lindell delayed a scheduled unveiling of his evidence on Wednesday at the symposium.
He had offered $5 million to any in-person attendee who can disprove his claims. The offer is no longer on the table, Mr. Merritt said.
The Sentinel always said we believe there was corruption in the election. The changes before the election helped Biden win. The corruption was in the state laws altered, often illegally, before the election to favor Joe Biden. The mail-in balloting, ballot harvesting, unsecured drop boxes everywhere, and similar activities are notoriously unreliable. You can’t prove that after an election.
~~~
UPDATE
We reported about this article the day before yesterday because we thought The Washington Times was more accurate than most of the MSM. Turns out we shouldn’t have trusted them. They made major errors and called the acknowledgment of those errors a ‘CORRECTION.’
It seems that Mr. Lindell’s lawyer did not confirm Mr. Merritt was the source of the statement that the data showing the election was manipulated by the Chinese Communists could not be verified. Also, Mr. Merritt isn’t on Mr. Lindell’s team. And Mr. Lindell did not withdraw the $5 million award for anyone who can disprove his evidence.
The key points of the article were in those three issues that were wrong but admittedly corrected quickly. But not before it traveled through the Internet.
That doesn’t mean we think he proved it or didn’t. You decide. Symposium Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Of COURSE, the fake news media coulr be RELIED UPON to deny the HARD PROOF that was presented.
When you use a mainstream media news publication as your primary source you lose all credibility with me. Mike Lindell deserves far more respect than he is given by any mainstream media outlet. The are after him because he threatens there livelihood. The CCP has tentacles in all MSM news media outlets and most of our government.
One expert who disagreed with the truth but did not chaim the 5 mill…stupid , but then that is his lie.. he believes in a narrative that is so weak that the light of Lindell’s truth burns it up. Just like Hell!!
The democommies are really stupid.
It should be undebatable that the machines were connected to the network. Instead of focusing on Lindell being a crackpot, which he is not, I recommend focusing on this:
Whistleblower Steps Forward — Provides Proof From Detroit Center that Election Machines Were Connected Online — WITH PHOTO
You can go to TGP to see this. Or, is the whistleblower also a crackpot?
Maybe DePerno is also a crackpot:
In June 2021 Attorney DePerno posted a series of tweets, where he explained how the EMS (election management system) was REMOTELY and successfully logged into anonymously on two different dates.
There are multiple, credible sources showing that machines were connected to the internet.
Note that all officials other than the few whistleblowers say they were not connected to the network, some that it is not possible to do that. Aren’t they the crackpots?
M, Yo have not seen the Maricopa report yet, but you are trying to state your conclusions of thigns which cannot be proven. There are several things, such as fake mail in ballots, which can be proven.