Looks like Repubs have the votes – no witnesses – but Schumer will drag it out

5
982

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) could be a ‘yes’ vote for witnesses. Last night Lamar Alexander said he would not vote for witnesses and Susan Collins said she would. Romney will vote for witnesses. However, the Senate Republicans have a 53-47 majority and it would take four defections for Democrats to win.

Even if Murkowski is a ‘yes,’ it’s a tie vote and a tie vote fails in the Senate. It could give the Justice the opportunity to step in, but he is not expected to do so ala Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase in the 1868 impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) asked Thursday why former national security adviser John Bolton should not be called to testify.

Murkowski, who is really a Democrat, as is Collins, is considered a swing vote.

The impeachment is unconstitutional, based on articles not enumerated in the Constitution. Murkowski’s job is to uphold the Constitution. That is the answer to her question.

SCHUMER WANTS TO DRAG OUT THE TRIAL

Once that gateway vote is quashed, anything can happen. The trial could still go on, despite a vote for no witnesses.

The Senate is a body of equals. It protects the right of the minority. Democrats could push for extended closing debate by the managers and counsels for both sides..and then debate by senators. They undoubtedly will.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram said, ” Interest to stretch out the trial may be driven by an appetite to boost Joe Biden in Iowa. Some of it may be to not give the President an acquittal just before State of the Union. Some of it may just be that the Senate needs to give its members more say and debate.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) wants to engineer votes to pin down GOP senators on a host of issues. That could stretch out the trial.

The elongated trial scenario just emerged overnight because no one knew where things would go on the gateway/witness vote.

In the end, the Republicans have the vote for acquittal.

 

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lisa
5 years ago

ok, so Murkowski voted no on witnesses, I WOULD NOT vote for her anyway…she is still a RINO…get her out of your state Alaska

HonorAmerica
5 years ago

Until the vote it’s all conjecture. Will he, won’t she, is like a soap opera, SSDD. Murky Murkowsi is playing out the melodrama eating up having the focus on her. What a bunch of Hollywood hacks, with parts in a grade Q production of fools. Featuring Murkowsky, Pierre Delecto, and the dottering Susan Collins.They’re so drunk on their own importance they can’t remember which party they stumbled into.As for the goldbricking dereliction of duty Democrats they’ll do anything to escape doing their job. We can remedy that and remove their useless lying asses in November. It’s no surprise the y want to hear from Bolton the the trashy novelist in his book; “The Room Where it Happened” What happened is he’s a vengeful War Hawk who lost his Bazooka and is as impotent as a gelded mule. Get over it Johnny and join the other eunuchs who have lost their manhood and the women have lost any semblance of the so called feminine mystique and became Femanazis. Damn shame their movement is as constipated as their mind. It’s not independence when you indulge in programmed “Group Think.”

5 years ago

Put an end to this coup charade.

Carson
5 years ago

these scum will continue to subvert the constitution until they are purged

The Prisoner
5 years ago

Roberts is a wild card.