Major Ruling! “Corporations Do Not Have a Freewheeling First Amendment Right to Censor”

3
201

In the Fifth Circuit today, Ken Paxton won a major First Amendment victory. The judge ruled that corporations do not have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say. The judge ruled against online political censorship.

A Texas law that bans social media companies from censoring users’ viewpoints is constitutionally allowed, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Friday, in a blow to Facebook, Twitter, and Google.

The ruling is a win for Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in their efforts to combat what they call censorship of conservative viewpoints by social media companies.

Judge Andrew S. Oldham opined that while “the platforms urge us to hold that the statute is facially unconstitutional and hence cannot be applied to anyone at any time under any circumstances,…today, we reject the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say.”

The Texas law does not take effect despite the ruling until the appeals court issues written instructions to the district court deciding the case.

THE LAW WAS BLOCKED IN MAY

The law, H.B. 20, had previously been blocked from taking effect by a May 5-4 Supreme Court ruling, which had granted an emergency request by tech trade groups NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association, which represent Facebook, Twitter, and Google. The trade groups have alleged the Texas law violates the First Amendment rights of the companies they represent.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is the hero of this ruling.

How did this get even this far? It’s also not over. Big Tech will appeal.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GuvGeek
2 years ago

A Solely Owned Single Proprietorship or Religious Organization would have a right censor. The reality is that a Corporation is created by Government and is thus an extension of Government. A Publicly Traded Corporation is a Public Square and silencing Speech in a Public Square is the action of Tyrants and Fascist. The First Amendment is Clear, Government or it’s “offspring” can’t silence speech.

John Vieira
2 years ago

Will sanity win???…or will the ‘censors’ of anything that ‘offends’ the proponents of the “ONE” narrative???

Peter B. Prange
2 years ago

The Twitter/Elon Musk saga shows the importance of members. If they keep censoring, then sensible people find a better platform.