Mayor Ted Wheeler won’t let police intervene if it’s an UNSAFE CROWD

8
613

The Portland mayor isn’t handcuffing his officers you will be happy to know. All he is doing is refusing to allow officers to be sent into an unsafe crowd. HUH?

Soon he will refuse to let his firefighters go into buildings where there are fires. In fact, he shouldn’t let his sanitation workers go near garbage that looks unsafe either.

The brilliant mayor thinks all he has to do is ban masks on criminals when they are committing violence. Without any action by police, that won’t work Marxist Mayor Ted Wheeler.

THIS IS ANARCHY FROM A MARXIST MAYOR

There was no police intervention here because it wasn’t safe for the police. Fortunately, this man could run fast.

Antifa is planning a border tour where they will create mayhem and violence but Governor Abbott of Texas told them they’d better not come to Texas.

The Portland mayor, on the other hand, is a weak leftist.

There won’t be any charges in the beating of Andy Ngo because they don’t have working police in Portland.

This wasn’t safe for the police.

This would be too unsafe for the police also.

At least the police are safe.

Omar appears to be an Antifa fan — they’re commies all.

VIOLENCE AND ANARCHY ARE COMING

In the end, the Democrat FBI doesn’t see Antifa as a domestic terrorist threat, they see white people and QAnon as threats.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
guidvce4
Guest
guidvce4
4 years ago

When will the law-abiding citizens of OR have had enough of this lawlessness? The mayor of Portland is obviously nuts. Allowing the lunatics to run the city streets will lead to utter chaos and loss of revenue for businesses in Portland. Then they move out. Presto. Portland becomes a ghost town.

The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner
4 years ago

Portland voters did this. Why visit Portland?

vladdi
Guest
vladdi
4 years ago

SO WHAT? THE SCROTUS HAS ALREADY RULED THAT NO COPS HAVE TO RISK THEIR LIVES JUST TO PROTECT YOU PEONS!

Like ALL criminals, cops want rights – to their paychecks, pensions, perks and power – without any concomitant corollary responsibilities (like, in actually having to risk their lives defending ours, which is what they had contractually agreed to get paid by us for in the first place)! In fact, they sued us – and were allowed to refuse to take any risks while remaining somehow entitled to their pay etc, by the Supreme Court, a few years back too!

Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html?_r=1&

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html

=======

The SCROTUS itself ruled that piggies have only rights to their paychecks
perks power and pensions, and no responsibilities whatsoever to peons.

Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By LINDA GREENHOUSE
Published: June 28, 2005

WASHINGTON, June 27 – The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html?_r=1&

John Vieira
Guest
John Vieira
4 years ago
Reply to  vladdi

Keep it up people and you will realize that by electing demoncraps…you will be disarmed and the police will aid and abet the armed felons who WILL do you in…

Flotmorton p. Gildersleeve
Guest
Flotmorton p. Gildersleeve
4 years ago

Someone is going to dope up Ted Wheeler, put a MAGA hat on him and put him in a crowd where there are ANTIFA THUGS…………………………………………………………………………………

Flotmorton p. Gildersleeve
Guest
Flotmorton p. Gildersleeve
4 years ago

former Airborne, Marines, Seals, Rangers, front and center………