MSNBC Anchor Thinks Trump Tweets Can Cause Radical Islamic Terror Attacks


An MSNBC anchor said yesterday that he wanted to know if the President of the United States was trying to provoke a terror attack with his tweets to “prove himself right”. This man needs to be fired immediately but he won’t be. He’s basically telling ISIS to use Trump’s tweets as an excuse.

This fool obviously doesn’t know we are engaged in a war with global jihadists and thinks we can tweet ourselves into terrorism.

The terror attacks are a global phenomenon. The radical Islamists plan to take over the West and will cause as much terror and chaos as possible in the West. They have a home in these multicultural cities being set up in Europe and in New York. The media is their enablers.

KSM told us it would happen

The 9/11 terrorist KSM, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, boasted that the media will further the Islamic cause.

“Your own government will turn on you. Your leaders will turn on you. They will turn on you to save themselves. It will play out in the media and strengthen the hearts of the brothers. It will recruit more to Allah’s cause because the press coverage will make the U.S. look weak and divided.”

KSM wrote the “practical” way to defeat America was through immigration and by outbreeding non-Muslims. He said jihadi-minded brothers would immigrate into t

The United States, taking advantage of the welfare system to support themselves while they spread their jihadi message.

They will wrap themselves in America’s rights and laws for protection, ratchet up acceptance of Sharia law, and then, only when they were strong enough, rise up and violently impose Sharia from within. He said the brothers would relentlessly continue their attacks and the American people eventually would become so tired, so frightened, and so weary of war that they would just want it to end.

“Eventually,” KSM said, “America will expose her neck to us for slaughter.”

Politicians are enablers

The media plays an extremely deleterious role in helping the West commit suicide. ABC News described the terrorists as “assailants” as do our political leaders.

The mayor of London is a good example of this. He used weasel words to explain away the attack, saying there is “no reason to be alarmed”. London is one of the “safest cities”, he claimed. He’s a dishonest man protected by the media and the politically correct.

We are reactive and ignoring the war the radicals have declared on us.

U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May was a little tougher Monday, saying that “We have seen overall too much tolerance of extremism in this country.” She repeated her call for a commission to take up “the necessary task of stamping out extremism.”

“This was an attack on London and the United Kingdom, but it was also an attack on the free world. She said Britain would review its counter-terrorism strategy and consider extending prison terms, and that more must be done to combat “bigotry and hatred.”

The “bigotry and hatred” is coming from the radical Islamists and even many of the moderate ones.

Democrat Senator Mark Warner of Virginia called into question President Donald Trump’s renewed call for a travel ban, made in the wake of Saturday night’s deadly terror attack in London with a tweet.

“One of the things that concerns me about the president’s tweets this morning, where he in effect is calling for a Muslim travel ban again, even though the courts have continued to turn that down…”

It is not a Muslim travel ban. That’s an absurd lie Democrats unabashedly spread. He should be concerned about the global jihad.

Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins said we need to do a better vetting of people coming into the U.S. but she feels the travel ban is too broad and was rejected by the courts. She should know better. It only hit nations that are terror nations and the judges who rejected it are Obama’s leftist embeds who violated the Constitution to reject it.

Susan Rice lied on This Week, the ABC Sunday news show, and said the Muslim travel ban would damage our relationships with the very community we need to win over. She lied about Benghazi also so this is no surprise.

Only terrorists have the weapons int he liberals ideal world

One witness to this weekend’s London attack was reported as saying, “They went ‘This is for Allah,’ and they had a woman on the floor. They were stabbing her.”.

People in the U.K. are unarmed and used objects in the restaurant to protect themselves as their politicians make their nations less safe.

Witness, Florin Morariu, a Romanian chef who works in the Bread Ahead bakery, said he saw people running and some fainting. Then two people approached another person and “began to stick the knife in … and then I froze and I didn’t know what to do.”

He said he managed to get near one attacker and “hit him around the head” with a bread basket.

Why are some police not carrying guns, preferably AKs?

A British Transport Police officer who was injured in the terrorist courageously faced the attackers armed only with his baton, according to police.

The unnamed officer, who is now in stable condition, joined the British Transport Police less than two years ago, Chief Constable Paul Crowther said in a statement.

The police chief was very proud of him, but wouldn’t it have made more sense for all officers to have guns, preferably AKs?

This was the third attack in Britain this year that ISIS has claimed – after a similar attack on Westminister Bridge in March and the Manchester attack: Police make more arrests as investigation widens two weeks ago – and one of several involving vehicles in Europe, including last year’s Bastille Day rampage in the French city of Nice.


  1. In other words, the liberal/left has found a way to campaign every day and all year even out of election years.

    because everyday of every year the main stream media campaigns for the liberal left and bashes conservatives.

    and this is going on every where, not only in the USA, it is going on everyday of every year in Canada, France, England, Belgium, Spain, Italy, Germany, Australia, Sweden, Denmark etc etc

    Imagine if the media everyday of every year since roughly the 1960s was using news events to say bad things about say, Pepsi and using news events to say positive things about Coca-Cola.

    when some criminal would be caught the media would mention he was a Pepsi drinker and when someone would do something heroic like save someone from a burning building they would mention he is a coca-coal drinker…and it would be like this every day of every year since the 1960s

    That would be insane right?

    Well that is EXACTLY what we have but instead of pepsi versus coca-cola we have political right versus political left

    everyday of every year the main stream media uses events to say bad things about the right and say good things about the left

    we should not tolerate that.

  2. And when Obama was president, it was embarrassing how they admired him and approved of everything he did.

    it was completely absurd…they sounded like teenagers fawning over a pop star

    for the entire 8 years they had nothing but great things to say about Obama and they of course swept under the carpet the IRS scandal, the Benghazi scandal etc etc

    when Bush was president they obsessively said negative things about him

    I know liberals who hated Bush who told me they were fed up with hearing radio-canada bash Bush, that they wish they would speak of something else! that gives you an idea of how obsessed with bashing the political right our media is here!

    The main stream media on almost the entire planet is controlled by hateful liberals…why else would the msm in almost every nation from Belgium to quebec bash conservative USA president and admire liberal USA presidents?

    They do it because it makes their own people hate their local/ their domestic right wing politicians and it makes people vote liberal.

    liberals have way too much power.

    the msm is way too corrupt.

  3. There is obviously something very wrong today with the main stream media, and the collusion goes beyond the USA border, let me explain with an example.

    I live near Montreal city in the province of quebec where over 90 % of the population IS French speaking and most of them barely speak a couple words of English.( my first language is French )

    Yesterday on the state sponsored french speaking tv station called radio-canada ( the english version is called the CBC ; canadian broadcasting corporation ) after they spent several minutes reporting on the last terror attack in London, they went out of their way and spent at least 30 seconds bashing Trump over a tweet message.

    Now Trump is not our president we are in Canada, and his tweet was about the London attack, so one has to wonder why they would include 30 seconds of bashing Trump in a report about a terror attack that happened in ENGLAND…

    That there was a terror attack in London was newsworty, that one of the victims was Canadian was news worthy, but to “inform us” of what Trump said in a tweet had only one purpose ; to brainwash people into hating Trump and the political right.

    Obviously they do that because they are told to bash the political right…told by whom? by the same people who tell CNN or the Washington Post to bash the right and promote the left.

    Now you are wondering what do they gain from brainwashing french canadians into hating Trump and the conservative / right? well this will make french canadians be more likely to vote liberal in the next elections.

    It is SO obvious the main stream media in pretty much every developped nation is controlled by the left.

    Every news is carefully presented to make people hate the right and love the left.

    There is no other reason why Trump is regularly bashed on tv news here in quebec; it is to make people hate conservatives and vote liberal.

Leave a Reply