The Leftists are infuriated over the Texas Supreme Court Case but 18 states who filed amici briefs are hard to ignore. The Pennsylvania Attorney General called the case “seditious.”
The NY Times wrote on Twitter: the Texas lawsuit asking the Supreme Court to reverse the election result is flawed, legal experts say. — Texas appears to have no claim to pursue the case. — Experts called the statistical arguments “comical.”
However, they are misrepresenting the case. The question is whether or not states can act like Third World dictatorships and change election laws to get the results they want.
Dr. John Eastman, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute, said they can’t. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue, and they cannot change the rules as they have, he asserts. He also recommends the appropriate solution.
Watch:
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
The two-fold Constitutional argument is straightforward. Changes by any person or entity other than the states’ legislatures are unconstitutional violations of Article I, Section 4. Furthermore, as Texas argues, they treat the citizens of Texas and other states who played by their own rules differently, and unequally, from the four swing states that violated their own rules. This is a violation of the Equal Protection clause in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
Robert Gore
Time for a divorce. We don’t need no CCP serf plantation (as sung to Pink Floyd).
The audacity of arrogance by the CPUSA will be their undoing and it couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of tone deaf pushy statist utopian dullards.
I did like Eastman’s response to the woman during testimony. She asked if he was a member of the bar in the state. He said No, but IS with the Appellate Court And the Supreme Court. Come to find out that same woman was in that room. No wonder she acted SO nervous during part of that hearing.