Senior news correspondent Adam Housley reported that a Federal source told him the bombs were not in danger of exploding since there was no detonation device. He added later that the FBI has NOT ruled out a foreign source.
He first tweeted: From fed source: “complete hoaxes” multiple wires when they only needed one, Housley tweeted. Reports of cell phones being involved was false. So no intention of harm. Now the questions. Dry run, or a false flag from the right or left trying to mess over the other side?
From fed source: “complete hoaxes” multiple wires when they only needed one. Reports of cell phones being involved was false. So no intention of harm. Now the questions. Dry run, or a false flag from the right or left trying to mess over the other side?
— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) October 24, 2018
The former Fox correspondent added that one tech thinks the perpetrator(s) stopped short of making the bomb viable for a reason. Perhaps it was a dry run, a hoax, or a foreign entity.
-
The Importance of Prayer: How a Christian Gold Company Stands Out by Defending Americans’ Retirement
Also…one technician thinks the person or persons responsible knew exactly what they were doing and stopped short for a reason and that they actually could have made them functional if they wanted to. Again…dry run? Hoax by the right or the left…or foreign entity?
— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) October 25, 2018
THE FOREIGN ENTITY ISN’T RULED OUT
In the wee hours of Thursday morning, Housley wrote on Twitter: And to stir it up even more…earlier this afternoon one investigator said a foreign entity hadn’t been ruled out. I gotta believe by this hour…they got a good idea.
We think so too. There are video cams everywhere; if couriers were used, they can be found; and there has to be evidence on the ‘bombs’ themselves.
Andrew Cuomo kept calling the ‘bomber’ a ‘he’ and an ‘individual’. It’s possible he knows it’s a ‘he’ and a lone bomber or it was just in manner of phrasing.
If it is a foreign entity, why? It could just be to mess with us and affect our elections. Wouldn’t it be ironic if the Russians did it? We aren’t spreading any rumors — just joking.
Unless it was mean to stir up both sides this close to an election. I have no idea, it that would be my guess. https://t.co/ZRVF41ZNVK
— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) October 25, 2018
The foreign source possibility would make sense. Who would send these ‘bombs’ nearly simultaneously to so many people and not expect to get caught? Someone in a foreign country would. If it is a foreign source who didn’t leave the country, he truly is nuts.
So collect all the comments from Democrats and the media about Republicans being to blame. We might need them soon. It’s likely this case will be wrapped up with an arrest(s) quickly.
The NY Times reported that the techs they hired to look at the photos think the bomb sent to CNN looks like a hoax bomb. It was possibly only meant to look scary and to terrorize.
“Some bomb technicians who studied photos of the device […] suggested that the bomb sent to CNN had hallmarks of fake explosives — the kind more typically depicted on television and in movies, rather than devices capable of detonating” https://t.co/nJ97wDpvs9
— John Ismay (@johnismay) October 25, 2018
As a side-note, last night, media misreported a story claiming two bombs were addressed to Maxine Waters but, as it happens, there was only one. There has been a lot of misreporting, so be careful.
And just for fun, why was Jim Acosta hanging around the bomb taking pictures when everyone was evacuated?
Photos of the bomb and package sent to CNN pic.twitter.com/nBq3ArtChJ
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 24, 2018
Subscribe to the Daily Newsletter