In his speech before the UN Tuesday, Barack Obama made an appeal for a World Government. Redistribution was a first priority during his speech.
Just as Agenda 2030 seeks to replace Capitalism with a Socialist economy, so does Barack Obama’s grander plan seek to replace some of our freedoms, eventually all, to world governance, and we must consider that it is Hillary Clinton’s plan as well.
The Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty, TISA, the Climate Change Agreement and all the other treaties Barack Obama would like to sign come with one underlying tenet – a world government serves as the rule maker. For now, we have to give up a little freedom and sovereignty for the greater good he envisions.
Obama sees globalization as the key to eradicating poverty, war and strife. While he claims to be a Capitalist, he supports a form of Socialism which would require one world interdependence.
“I do not think America can or should impose our model on other countries,” Obama said, but added that there was an ongoing conflict between liberalism and authoritarianism, in which he was not neutral.“I believe in a liberal political order,” he said.
Of course he does not recognize his own authoritarianism, his lawlessness, his refusal to go through Congress or consider the will of the people because his vision is well beyond national sovereignty.
Such a political order, he explained, is what globalization has been about in the quarter-century since the Cold War ended.
“The integration of our global economy has made life better for billions,” he said, noting that the share of world population living in extreme poverty went from 40 percent to 10 percent.
“The world is by many measures less violent and more prosperous than ever before,” he said. Because the benefits of globalization have not been evenly shared, however, “our societies are filled with unease and strife.”
While nothing that globalization and rapid progress of technology have diminished ability of workers to earn a decent wage, with many good paying jobs disappearing, Obama pleaded with the world leaders not to waver.
“The existing path toward global integration requires a course correction,” he said, calling on the world not to reject global integration, but to “work together to see the benefits of integration are more broadly shared.”
Global integration is a benign way of calling for a borderless world.
He pointed to the controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership as an example of a trade deal that would do that, by raising labor standards.
He told nations to give up some autonomy and freedom for security in this one world government.
He sees the Dictator’s Club – the UN – as an organization that can bring about this promise and “powerful nations” like the US will have to accept constraints and give up some freedom.
A number of years back, Samantha Power, our Ambassador to the UN, said these treaties that force us to accede to world governance will require us to “give up a smidgeon of freedom.” Secretary of State John Kerry recently said we must get used to the idea of a “borderless world.”
Obama would allow us to defend ourselves but sees us bound to the laws of a one world government in all matters, limiting our freedom to act in the long run.
Obama warned against walls and borders because of his belief in one world government. He is the ultimate globalist Socialist.
Obama told the UN, “We can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding to replace the ravages of war with cooperation if powerful nations like my own accept constraints. I’m convinced in the long run giving up some freedom of action, not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests but binding ourselves to international rules, over the long-term, enhances our security.”
Using the term Socialism is generous, this is more of a type of Communism he is promoting.
Listen to this brief montage: