Because if you lived, as I did, several years under Nazi totalitarianism, and then 20 years in communist totalitarianism, you would certainly realize how precious freedom is, and how easy it is to lose your freedom.
~ Milos Forman
Vladimir Obama has circumvented the constitution (it’s so old anyway – ask Justice Ginsberg) and bypassed Congress by using Executive Orders, debt, and government agency overreach. He was merely getting started. Now, he’s really on a roll by blatantly signing away our sovereignty to Marxist International Law – it is so much faster and it’s permanent. Once these treaties are signed, they will be the law of our land. In effect, the Senate is willing to turn the U.S. over to the U.N.
Let’s look at some of the more recent power grabs. There is the Anti-counterfeiting treaty which turns our Internet over to international law (under the Marxist UN, where our way of life is despised). What about Executive Order 13547, which seizes our waterways, and Executive Order 13575, which seizes the heartland – both are intended to subject our waterways and rural lands respectively to ICLEI guidelines, in conformity with the UN Agenda 21.
Don’t forget that we went to war with Libya without congressional approval – Obama and Hillary pushed for a UN Security Council Resolution and after the UN passed it, Hillary and Obama said they had to abide by it. As Obama said, “the writ of the international community must be enforced.” He ceded our right to wage war to a UN body.
That’s a brief summary of what has been going on. Now consider four new upcoming treaties which will further the Obama administration’s war on the constitution.
The first is an International Criminal Court:
The ICC will supersede our U.S. courts and give an international criminal court the right to prosecute our citizens for alleged war crimes and aggression. That means an end to trial by a jury of your peers, a right to an attorney, the right to not self-incriminate, a right to a speedy trial, bail, and the list is endless.
This would put our servicemen and women in grave danger as well as any officials in our government because they could be arrested by a foreign court and put on trial for war crimes.
Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama have joined forces with non-government entities such as think tanks to push for a globally recognized International Criminal Court (ICC) which would give the UN’s global tribunal universal jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression.
Hillary Clinton has said, it is a ‘great regret’ that the U.S. is not in International Criminal Court. She not only regrets it but she continually cooperates with it, not to be cooperative, but to cede our sovereignty.
Look at what is going on with the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty – one of the more outrageous recommendations is to treat copyright infringers as if they were Somali pirates. Of course an international court would supersede our constitutional rights. Read here: Guardian UK
The second is the Law of the Sea Treaty (UNCLOS):
UNCLOS established a legal regime for navigation and international management of oceanic resources, including the deep seabed. Remember when I mentioned executive order 13547 in the second paragraph? That is the foundation for this treaty. All our minerals and resources will be turned over to the UN for redistribution to the world.
In turn, they will give us nothing.
Also, instead of settling for our own bureaucracies, we can suffer under world bureaucracies as they steal our resources because they believe our wealth belongs to the world in accordance with Marxist philosophy.
All disputes will fall under global jurisdiction. Read here: Heritage
Remember Executive Order 13575, the agreement to seize our rural lands, which I mentioned in the second paragraph? It will follow the UN Agenda 21 on Sustainable Development and will morph into a treaty which will cede our agriculture to the U.N.
The third is the Small Arms Treaty:
The Examiner reported on this in October of last year. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are after the second amendment and see a UN treaty as the best way to further their goals. Hillary plans to sign the UN’s small arms treaty into law and, with a Democratic Senate, it will pass. It will force the U.S. to abide by international laws on gun rights.
The treaty will do the following –
- Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.
- Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).
- Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).
- Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.
- In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights. Read here: Forbes
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” ~ Thomas Jefferson
The fourth is U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC):
This monstrosity is about to be signed into law by the Senate. It not only puts the government in between the parent and the child, it puts international government law in a superior role.
This treaty promotes the rights of children and it devises a road map to guide government officials in the improvement of laws and policies by defining which rights the government should give to children. Their core principles are “the best interests of the child” and the “child’s evolving capacities.”
What does that mean? It’s not innocent and what we do know is it is a grave departure from U.S. law which allows parents to raise their children without governmental interference unless they are abusive or neglectful. Under this treaty, the government can decide that a parent has not met these requirements and overrule parents at any turn.
This is most definitely a case for a constitutional amendment. It is one more way for the Obama administration to trample the constitution and make it null and void. Well, who cares, the constitution is “old” anyway. Read more: parentalrights.org
Please listen to Dick Morris’ video: Dick Morris