Omar refuses to say she’s not a communist or pro-al-Qaeda

7
3128

During the afternoon presser on Monday, Rep. Ilhan Omar refused to disavow al Qaeda when a reporter asked, “Can you respond to the President’s claims that you’re a communist and that you’re pro-al-Qaeda?”

After making the usual reference to Islamophobia and the President’s Sunday tweets, she simply refused to do it. “We are no longer going to allow the dignification of such a ridiculous, ridiculous statement,” Omar said.

It’s not a ridiculous question and she should answer it. This is why people think she’s a communist who admires al Qaeda.

KERIK SAID IN APRIL OMAR IS ‘INFATUATED WITH AL QAEDA’

Former New York Police Department (NYPD) Commissioner Bernard Kerik said Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) is “infatuated with al Qaeda” on Fox News in April of this year.

Kerik told Fox’s Sean Hannity that Omar, one of the first two Muslim women elected to Congress, was addressing “a terrorist organization” when she spoke before the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in March.

“She is infatuated with al Qaeda, with Hamas, Hezbollah,” Kerik said. “I personally think she should be removed from Congress. She should be voted out for sure, but she shouldn’t be on the Foreign Relations Committee.” (Omar sits on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.)

Kerik made note of the fact that Omar asked a federal judge for “leniency for a convicted terrorist.” At the time, she wrote to a district court judge that “a restorative approach to justice” would be a more effective deterrent to radicalization than “a long prison sentence” in the case of a Minnesota man [it was actually 9 men] convicted of attempting to join the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

When she wrote the letter, she said, the ISIS terrorists had a “radical approach to change-making.”

Omar wrote: “The restorative approach provides a long-term solution – though the self-declared Islamic State may soon suffer defeat, their radical approach to change-making will continue as it has throughout history – by criminalizing the undergirding construct rather than its predisposed victims. Therein, this ruling can set a precedent and has the potential to be a landmark case in addressing extremism.”

In the next clip, listen to her laughing about al Qaeda.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Curmudgeon
Guest
Curmudgeon
4 years ago

It is irrelevant whether the POS Omar is a communist. Allegedly, she has the right to political freedom. As for al Qaeda, since it is a creation of the US intelligence services under the direction of Tim Osman aka Osama bin Laden, no matter what she answers, it will be spun as “anti-American”.
Interestingly, it was former FBI agent Ted Gunderson who outed bin Laden as a CIA asset. The same Ted Gunderson, who died under suspicious circumstances and was investigating child trafficking in the US.
http://tedgunderson.info/index.html

4TimesAYear
Guest
4TimesAYear
4 years ago
Reply to  Curmudgeon

Unless she’s in violation of her oath to uphold the Constitution. If she supports Antifa terrorism, she’s in violation of her oath of office.

Rudman
Guest
Rudman
4 years ago

Trump TRUMPS CAIR and their useful idiot Omar and the Squad. Better than any Hollyweired movie out their by far. KEEP THEM ROLLING PDJT! YOU ARE THE BEST! GOD SENT YOU FOR A VERY GOOD REASON. GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR FAMILY. OH AND OF COURSE – THE BEST EVER SUPPORTERS!

Anthony Alfaro
Guest
Anthony Alfaro
4 years ago

And we should believe her because she is such an honest person even though she married her brother and listed him as her husband in her immigration application Then she used campaign money to divorce her brother and marry some other jihadist. Most of all, she never stops telling everyone how grateful she is to be in America instead of her beloved, piece of heaven on earth, Somalia.

Greg
Guest
Greg
4 years ago

You will notice over the years Muslim have condemned “terrorists” without giving any specifics. When asked about Al-Qaeda they will say “we condemn terrorism” and many will assume that Means Al-Qaeda when it does not. There is a great deal of “wordplay” in the way they speak. Mahmoud Abbas has been a master of this wordplay. There is a reason they are non-specific.

John Vieira
Guest
John Vieira
4 years ago
Reply to  Greg

They are in full fledged “taqiyya”, “Doctrine of Deceit”, mode !!!

herbert r richmond
Member
herbert r richmond
4 years ago

She is an Islamic Supremacist, a covert terrorist supporter and a hardcore Marxist.