Pathetic! Kirsten Gillibrand will ban gun stuff already banned

5
260

Kirsten Gillibrand made a fool of herself during the Fox News town hall first by insulting Fox News after she was asked a question her thoughts about third-trimester abortion. Wallace shut her down. She actually blamed Fox for talking about Ralph Northam’s support of infanticide.

She was even worse when it came to guns. Gillibrand claimed the NRA only cares about selling guns, only they don’t sell guns.

Wallace asked about her 180 degrees flip on gun control. That didn’t go well either. Beyond attacking and insulting, she has nothing to offer.

ALL THE THINGS SHE WILL BAN ARE BANNED

Gillibrand wants to ban bump stocks but the President already banned them. They were approved originally under Barack Obama.

She wants to ban abusers named in restraining orders from owning guns, but they are already banned.

Military weapons are banned and she wants to ban them too.

Gillibrand wants to ban gravely mentally ill people from owning guns, but they are already banned from owning guns — since Bill Clinton in fact.

So, basically, she will ban things already banned. Vote for her!


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kel
Guest
Kel
4 years ago

So what she’s really saying in her little ‘speech” about the Golden Rule is that “I supported gun rights when I represented Rural Upstate New York; I knew those farmers and country folk, the ones living in my ‘back yard’, took their 2A rights very seriously, and so I knew I had to pretend to be working to preserve them. But when I took onto the Big Time, the National Stage, I knew that was no longer politically convenient, so I abandoned my home voters, the ones who started my political career, the ones who cared so much about their 2A rights. I abandoned the rubes, and started going around trashing the 2A, trying to get all their guns taken away from them because that’s what it takes to get urban liberal votes these days. I had to have my priorities, and a successful career is more important than remembering the local voters who started my career and trusted me to look after their rights. See, when I was JUST their representative, it behooved me to defend their rights against all comers. But when I saw the prospect of getting more votes from elsewhere, it was wiser to turn to trying to destroy their rights instead, to please all the people in other places who might vote for me because of it”.
That’s what she’s actually saying. “I was not to be trusted when I pretended to defend my neighbor’s rights, and I am not to be trusted now that I have sold my neighbors out and gone to attacking their rights in exchange for votes from people in MORE IMPORTANT places, like the cities”. What a c&nt. I am glad there is almost zero chance of her winning the nomination, let alone the presidency. I don’t trust any politicians, but I trust her less than most. Pure fake, will do anything for her career, has no principles beyond what she thinks will get her elected best. And not too bright either.

Kel
Guest
Kel
4 years ago

Well, let’s be fair. The problem is just that she is TOO honest. She didn’t want to make any promises that she might not be able to carry through on, so she made sure to only promise to ban things that were already banned. That way, she could be 100% sure of carrying it out. On seeking re-election: “When I was running for President, I swore I would see bump stocks banned, mentally ill people forbidden to have guns, accused abusers stripped of their 2nd Amendment Rights: and I can proudly say that every one of those things is official law in the United States as we speak! Vote for me again!”

Zigmont
Guest
Zigmont
4 years ago

The NRA has posted a letter Kirsten Gillibrand wrote to them in 2008, here are a few praises of her support for them…………….“I appreciate the work that the NRA does to protect gun owners rights, and I look forward to working with you for many years.”…….she opposed “outright banning” guns based on “cosmetic features” or creating “arbitrary” waiting periods for purchasing firearms……..“I share your concerns about these and other attempts to that could contribute to the slippery slope of government confiscation of people’s firearms based on the arbitrary whims of politics and public opinion,”……….another politician not to be trusted!!!!!!!

Snarkles the Klown
Guest
Snarkles the Klown
4 years ago

Chicago is a gun free zone and 52 people were shot over the weekend. I guess they didn’t notice the gun free zone signs?

herbert r richmond
Member
herbert r richmond
4 years ago

Wallace finally did his job only because he was dealing with an idiot who did not know what she was talking about.