Paxton Trial: Bush People Went to the FBI with No Evidence

4
497

Mr. Ken Paxton, the state attorney general who has become a conservative star, is the first Texas official to be impeached in the House of Representatives in nearly half a century. He is suspended from legal authority within the state during the impeachment trial in the State Senate.

Texas State Rep. Harold Dutton, a Democrat, announced his opposition to the impeachment motion against Ken Paxton due to the lack of due process. The rushed impeachment without due process sets a terrible precedent. Numerous Republicans on the state and national level have criticized the move as well as Texas Republican Party Chairman Matt Rinaldi.

An investigative panel that included three Republicans and two Democrats recommended Thursday that the attorney general be impeached on 20 articles including bribery, unfitness for office, and abuse of public trust.

You should know that George Bush and Karl Rove are believed to be behind this.

THE MOTIVE

During the second day of the impeachment trial of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, his fierce lawyer Tony Buzbee went to possible motives for this impeachment.

The motive is that Ken Paxton defeated George P. Bush in the primary race.  The Bush’s and the establishment weren’t pleased.

We know how vindictive they became after seeing what happened when Jeb lost in 2016 to Donald Trump.

Jeff Mateer was the Assistant Attorney General when Paxton took office and he might be a Bushie, I’m not certain. He pointed to an interesting ‘coincidence’ that concerns George P. Bush reactivating his law license.

Mateer looks like a deer caught in the headlights.

THEY WENT TO THE FBI WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE

On the third day, Ken Paxton accuser Ryan Vassar took the stand in the Texas Senate on Thursday in the impeachment trial. Vassar admitted he went to the FBI without any evidence.

The group of deputy attorneys in his office (the Bush people) admitted they went running to the FBI for investigative support against Paxton, despite having no evidence of wrongdoing.

To the question – the Paxton lawyer had to ask several times of whether Vassar went to the FBI without any evidence -Vassar, like a slimy deceptive, said it was “in good faith,” ‘we had reasonable conclusions,” “yes, he went,” “we “reported,” and he went with “facts.” Finally, he answered that “Yes, that’s right, we went WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE.” Before that, he said he “had no evidence he could point to.”

This first caught my attention at The Last Refuge.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fred
1 year ago

The Bushies need to be exiled to the land where Obama chefs live.

jazzfusionary
1 year ago

Vassar finally admitted he went to the FBI with NO evidence. Then he later perjured himself trying to contradict his own testimony. The disgraced Bush family has lost the country so the only chance they have is through criminal lawfare.

The Prisoner
1 year ago

The participation of Johnny Sutton (mentioned in the first video) is suspicious! He was a notorious US attorney who about 20 years ago did an aggressive prosecution against border patrol agents, and rigged the jury. The agents were wrongly convicted then pardoned later. His name was dirt and he has had a low profile since then.

The frame operation on Paxton is similar to Trump’s. Fake accusations are given to the FBI, which is used as justification to destroy the man. Later, the accused is fully cleared. Those fake accusation are solicited by the FBI.

Tim Kuehl
1 year ago
Reply to  The Prisoner

US Attorney under George W. Bush, Johnny Sutton rubbed his arrogance in the faces of slain Border Agent Luis Aguilar’s family when he showed at Agent Aguilar’s funeral and seated himself in the front row. It is believed Aguilar did not fire on a fleeing Hummer driven towards him by drug smuggler Jesus Navarro-Montes because of US Attorney Johnny Sutton’s penchant for prosecuting law enforcement officers who use their weapons in the line of duty against drug and human smugglers. Case in point, Sutton prosecuted Border Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean who used their weapons in the line of duty against drug smuggler with a history of violence and being armed. Sutton went so far as to seek out drug smuggler Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila in Mexico, bring him to the US to be treated at a US Army base in Texas, then give him carte blanche to travel freely between Mexico and the US while he prosecuted Ramos and Compean. What a guy.