Pelosi’s planning funding for WHO & UN in her next trillion dollar relief bill

10
835

Nancy Pelosi is refusing to allow Congress to come back into session. She is busy though, planning another trillion-dollar-plus coronavirus bill in secret. “There will be a bill,” she insisted, and “it will be expensive.”

When she is done, she plans to call Congress back into session and hold an immediate vote.

The far-left, which appears to control the Democrat Party, insists funding for the World Health Organization be included and increased. They want U.N. funding increased as well as our country is sinking into incredible debt.

There is no reason for the U.S. to fund the China-centric criminals in WHO.

She’s also insisting on funding for states and local governments.

THIS IS GOING ON AS THE US BORROWS NEARLY 3 TRILLION TO SURVIVE ANOTHER FISCAL YEAR

As this irresponsible spending is going on, Senior Treasury Department officials said Monday the U.S. is borrowing more in the second quarter than it did in all of last year due to coronavirus relief spending and reduced tax revenue.

A Treasury official said Monday the U.S. will borrow $2.999 trillion in privately-held net marketable debt in the second quarter, assuming an end-of-June cash balance of $800 billion.

Last fiscal year, the Treasury’s net borrowing was $1.28 trillion and now we are more than doubling it.

It’s time to stop spending and borrowing and open up the economy for business. This is insane. Nancy, take you gift package for WHO and the UN and fund it yourself.

And Nancy, get back to work.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
5 years ago

Nancy will easily get her way with China Mitch, always does.
Last time, she suckered Mitch into supporting her bill before she produced it.
The bumbler told his members to vote for it!
Then, she inserted lots of reckless leftist spending.
Then, he had his fake outrage, and pretended to be controlling spending.
It was very embarrassing for Mitch, but the public fell for his act.

Does anyone here think the a senate “leader” closely connected with China will fight WHO & UN funding?

5 years ago

She reveals with every stimulus bill where her worship of authority is.

John Vieira
5 years ago

What you are witnessing here is the “power of the press”…unfortunately there are wide swaths of people, worldwide, that STILL believe that what the BBC, CBC, MBC, CNN, MSNBC, ad infinitum proffer up is “gospel” and NEVER peruse non-MSM mediums. Hence much too many are virtually “ignorant” and DO believe the garbage that they are being force fed. Alternate sites, such as this one, are further inhibited by the recently, two years now(?), draconian censorship being employed by “social media” to assist their miscreant allies in the MSM. The battle is lopsided in favour of evil…that is why we all most likely, in the very near future, will be “vaccine numbered”, without a doubt, with Microsoft’s recently patented…060606…micro chip !!!

John Vieira
5 years ago
Reply to  John Vieira

P. S. The DNC and the globalist are therefore able to continue to virtually “spit on” their followers and the rest of us with impunity, due to this phenomenon

5 years ago

PDJT doesn’t have to sign it when it hits his desk. Will the Senate pass it? Doubtful. Once again, Nanzi Piglousy is overplaying her hand. And she will pay for it come Nov. 3rd.
Great bumper sticker I saw, “wanna stay poor, vote democrat”.

Russell Gillis
5 years ago

There is no line item veto.

nubmaeme
5 years ago
Reply to  Russell Gillis

Thank you. I was not aware it had been done away with.

5 years ago
Reply to  nubmaeme

It was deemed Unconstitutional after Bill Clinton used it – and the Republicans complained. The Supremes (NOT Diana Ross) ruled that the Constitution says that The House has control of the purse strings and the Executive Branch cannot override them. THAT is why Our President has trouble getting enuff $$$ to finish Our Country’s Wall.

nubmaeme
5 years ago
Reply to  billybobtexas

Thanks for the info.

nubmaeme
5 years ago

I may be mistaken but don’t these spending bills have to go to Trump for signature? Why doesn’t he use a line-item veto on all the garbage like funding for the UN and WHO? Once it’s signed like that, there should not be anything that dingbat could do about it except whine and have yet another tantrum.