Quacks! Recent underreported CDC study is the most informative of all

6
1355

Opinion

Please note: We are not recommending anyone not wear masks as required.

To be or not to be, to mask or not to mask, that is the question. To properly ask that question we have repeatedly gone to the CDC’s Dr. Quackery for the answer. While it has left us confused, we will continue to do what we’ve been doing, staying away from sick people, social distancing, and using the mask when required to buy groceries or get into a restaurant.

CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield told us not to bother with masks since they don’t work, then he discovered they are critical, but now it looks like they are making things worse.

We look forward to the next blurt from the hogwash at the CDC to cover their imperious butts.

Randomized studies, even out of WHO in 2019, couldn’t prove they work.

THE STUDY

An underreported, way-underreported study, recently-published by the CDC, their study provides more evidence that cloth masks or other forms of mandated face coverings  contribute to our COVID-19 problem.

It also shows Americans are wearing masks, but instead of helping, it might be making the problem worse.

The CDC study, which surveyed symptomatic COVID-19 patients, has found that 70.6% of respondents reported “always” wearing a mask, while an additional 14.4% say they “often” wear a mask. That means a whopping 85% of infected COVID-19 patients reported habitual mask wearing. Only 3.9% of those infected said they “never” wear a face covering.

Masks simply aren’t working to “slow the spread” or “stop the spread.” The study also dismisses “public health experts’” claims from individuals such as Dr. Anthony Fauci are not following the guidance being disseminated by the CDC and other disease control agencies.

People are wearing masks but it’s not helping, and it might be making things worse:
But…but…it’s better than a vaccine, man, ya know:
No, masks don’t work, it’s your personal choice:
DON’T WEAR THE MASKS!

The much-maligned Sweden did great and they don’t give a hoot what you think:

Too much hysteria. Open up!

N.B. Newsguard informs us: …the study did not conclude that masks are ineffective or increase the risk of contracting COVID-19. While your article accurately described figures about mask-wearing from the study, it failed to note that the study population was made up of mostly mask wearers (303 of the 314 participants), so when comparing the proportion of people who tested positive for COVID-19, mask-wearers would always be the majority, as explained here: https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/mask-use-does-not-lead-to-a-higher-risk-of-covid-19-as-viral-social-media-posts-claim/

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 years ago

The virus was never isolated unless the sample was adulterated(monkey kidney cells). So at this point, based on this fact alone, we don’t know what we’re dealing with that has a 99% survival rate. SARS, MERS or Influenza.
PCR amplification is a method not a test and false positives are what we see right now, a casedemic. K Mullis, the Nobel prize winner for PCR stated clearly that this should not be used as a test.
In terms of masks, they’re not only useless but harmful.
Long term use of masks, cause a reuptake of our CO2, that leads to a certain level of deoxygenation, that leads to inflammation, that leads to higher level of stress hormones(cortisol is one of them), that leads to a certain level of a temporary immune suppression that can last up to 24 hrs and then the cycle repeats. This makes the individual more prone to all kind of infections and respiratory infections, as well.

A few studies out of many:

Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery.

Objectives: This study was undertaken to evaluate whether the surgeons’ oxygen saturation of hemoglobin was affected by the surgical mask or not during major operations.
Methods: Repeated measures, longitudinal and prospective observational study was performed on 53 surgeons using a pulse oximeter pre and postoperatively.

Results: Our study revealed a decrease in the oxygen saturation of arterial pulsations (SpO2) and a slight increase in pulse rates compared to preoperative values in all surgeon groups. The decrease was more prominent in the surgeons aged over 35.
Conclusions: Considering our findings, pulse rates of the surgeon’s increase and SpO2 decrease after the first hour. This early change in SpO2 may be either due to the facial mask or the operational stress. Since a very small decrease in saturation at this level, reflects a large decrease in PaO2, our findings may have a clinical value for the health workers and the surgeons.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/

Immune system

They’re talking about our precious cellular immunity.

“Unlike T and B cells that increased at 6 minutes, mean NK cell numbers showed a rapid decrease at 6 minutes.

Mean CD62L+ T plus NK cell numbers increased at 6 minutes (p < 0.01), declined to become indistinguishable from baseline at 15 minutes (p = 0.59), and continued to decrease, reaching their lowest levels at 2 hours.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3412918/#!po=0.260417

If you miss Fauci from this picture, here is the crook with a study in 1974 that explains the cortisol effect on the immune system. So he know very well why pushing for wearing masks might benefit Big Pharma’s Agenda. The more sick, the better.

Fauci 1974
The effect of in vivo hydrocortisone on subpopulations of human lymphocytes

This study was designed to determine the effect of in vivo hydrocortisone on subpopulations of lymphoid cells in normal humans.

“Subjects received a single intravenous dose of either 100 mg or 400 mg of hydrocortisone, and blood was drawn at hourly intervals for 6 h, and then again at 10 and 24 h after injection. Profound decreases in absolute numbers of circulating lymphocytes and monocytes occurred at 4-6 h after both 100 mg and 400 mg of hydrocortisone.

Counts returned to normal by 24 h.

The relative proportion of circulating thymus-derived lymphocytes as measured by the sheep red blood cell rosette assay decreased maximally by 4 h and returned to base line 24 h after hydrocortisone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4808638/

Study of N95 masks vs surgical
The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32167245/

And here some unbiased vs biased WHO studies:

Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence.

Japan, despite its widespread use of face masks, experienced its most recent influenza epidemic with more than 5 million people falling ill just one year ago, in January and February 2019. However, unlike SARS-2, the influenza virus is transmitted by children, too.

https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/

Say No to masks
Say No to New Normal
Say No to Corona vaccine
Say No to the NWO

Say yes to Hydroxychloroquine
Say yes to cellular immunity testing
Say yes to Quercetin and Zinc picolinate
Say yes to molecular iodine
Say yes to nebulized ionic silver.

Beside anything else, we maintain an environment moist and warm where mold and bacteria thrive.

T'
4 years ago

Redfield ia a quack. He has no redeeming qualities. He messed up the testing, was not prepared, and still is not prepared, to actually test for the virus. He produced guidelines distributed nationwide to deliberately overcount deaths and cases.

Treebark Peel
4 years ago

@ Greg,

I see people without them in stores that have the mask required sign on the door. To be honest it makes me question my own edgy rebel status and I salute them.
I’m not mad at the store for putting profits above so called health. I know they are in it for the money and not my friend or buddy.
The local Sack N’ Save now has order online and pickup around the side of the building with monstrous speed bumps and designated parking spots.
2020 will be remembered as a through the looking glass moment.

Greg
4 years ago

We should Never forget how certain policies were created to put the damn blame on the public if there was increasing cases and deaths. Bureaucrats and Politicians were in fear they would be construed as Not caring. It’s why so many, media and politicians both, would highlight in dramatic fashion every time people would congregate with masks, or not maintaining social distance. Listen to the words during all those briefings. When cases and deaths were going down they all said how good* the public was doing in “preventing” the spread. REALLY???? BS!!! We’ve had More cases and More deaths Because of the policies of bureaucrats. All the medical professionals who disputed that 14 yr. old’s conclusion said the result Would Be an **increase in fatalities. The return spike was Not because of the public, it was predicted. The case of Sweden is proof in the numbers. Their own admitted fault was not protecting the vulnerable in nursing home environments. NOW, we should all be asking WHEN will an investigation be done for a True accounting of deaths.

Greg
4 years ago

I still do not wear a mask anywhere I go. So far no one has confronted me, although some patrons have fear in their eyes as I walk around. I’m more convinced the virus has now mutated to the point of insignificance for most people. There appears no ill effects for all those who were “infected” at the same time as the President. We can now have millions of cases with no ill effects. This is what viruses do. Was there a continuous issue with SARS or MERS after a short period of time. That is what is typical of these respiratory viruses. They come on strong initially, but mutate quickly to being non-lethal. I suspect That had been reached some time ago.