Former Labor Secretary and racist Tom Perez has won the position of DNC Chair. He is Barack Obama’s choice and his doppelgänger. As a liar, racialist, manipulator and Marxist, he is the right choice for the new hard-left Democrat Party.
Perez lied about his family history, is hard left, and will bring the Democrat Party to the furthest left fringe.
- Perez lied about his family history in order to further a political narrative of public service.
- His grandfather, who he says spoke out about the Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo, actually represented and defended the tyrant in Washington for five years before eventually heading into exile.
- Perez would take the DNC even further to the left-wing fringes.
- Perez is a radical on immigration, having prosecuted Border Patrol agents and served on the board of a radical group to help Central American illegal immigrants.
- Perez is a radical on racial issues, having used disparate impact theory to assess civil rights and discrimination cases. Perez also dropped the DOJ case against the Black
- Panther Party for voter intimidation because he doesn’t believe that civil rights laws can be race neutral.
- Perez used his private e-mail 1,200 times to conduct official business – taking a lesson from his party’s failed presidential nominee.
- This is a good time to remember how Perez wanted to label Bernie Sanders a racist. Perez and the DNC worked together to undermine Bernie Sanders.
The Plot Against Bernie
This is a good time to remember how Perez wanted to label Bernie Sanders a racist. Perez and the DNC worked together to undermine Bernie Sanders.
In the Podesta files, email 4429, Tom Perez wrote to John Podesta, to tell Clinton campaign staff that they should use racial identity as a wedge issue in the Democrat primary and “put and fork once and for all in the false narrative about Bernie and Latinos”.
Perez stated that because Clinton’s “plan to attract all minority voters” worked in Nevada, they could use that to change the current narrative that Bernie does does great with young voters.
“Emmy and the team have a good plan to attract all minority voters,” he wrote. “When we do well there, then the narrative changes from Bernie kicks ass among young voters to Bernie does well only among young white liberals– that is a different story and a perfect lead in to South Carolina, where once again, we can work to attract young voters of color.”
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 25, 2017
Perez is a snake who wants to rebuild the party in Obama’s image and likeness.
Perez’s pitch is to “think big, act tactically.” Perez likes to describe himself as a progressive who “delivers results”. He’s a dirty tricks guy.
The Sentinel was hoping for the terrorist, Keith Ellison, so the Democrats would be assured of never winning for a long, long time.
Open Borders Proponent, Redistributionist
Perez, an open borders guy, started out at NALEO by condemning “rogue” Sheriff Joe Arpaio for alleged “racial profiling.”
He considers Arpaio “rogue” because he wants to deport people who come here illegally.
Perez took the lead against Arizona’s SB 1070 which was a valid interpretation and enforcement of federal law.
Perez, a civil rights lawyer tapped for President Barack Obama’s Cabinet in 2013, touted the Obama administration’s efforts to raise the minimum wage. He’s a redistributionist and he wants to decide who is getting ‘too much’ because ‘it’s not who we are’, the Marxist said.
“Whether you’re a conservative or a progressive, a fair minimum wage [Marxist] has always been a lynchpin of a thriving economy, but the Tea Party is holding it hostage,” he said.
It’s “unconscionable” for Republican presidential candidates to oppose raising the minimum wage, according to Tom Perez, a hardcore Marxist.
“If you want to grow the economy, elect a Democrat,” Perez said.
Perez is a racialist and an open borders proponent. He also has issues of competence.
An internal watchdog report released by the DOJ’s Inspector General, Michael E. Horowitz, harshly criticized Perez’ department while under his leadership. Perez blamed it on Bush but the report shows clearly that racialism is a serious problem in the department because of his leadership.
The report states that “the politically charged atmosphere and polarization within the Voting Section continued even after the 2009 change in the Division’s leadership.”
While there was insufficient evidence of clear wrongdoing, the report states that the high level of “mistrust and polarization” in the department puts enforcement of voting laws and redistricting at risk of improper handling.
Since 2009, cases of white victims were ignored and the cases taken up were “traditional” civil rights cases on behalf of racial or ethnic minorities who have been the historical victims of discrimination.”
One former attorney, J. Christian Adams, claimed bias in the New Black Panthers case [New Black Panthers voter intimidation case] but the case was dismissed. He resigned as a DOJ lawyer because he was told that they would only be litigating cases in which the defendants are minorities.
The DOJ report vindicates Adams.
Perez was the head of the votings section when the New Black Panther’s case was dismissed on May 15, 2009
The 258-page report can be read on this link.
Perez led the administration’s racial alarmists against voter ID laws in South Carolina but was shot down by the U.S. District Court for the D.C. Circuit. Similar cases he litigated have been struck down in Arkansas, Florida and New York.
Perez is a believer in quota systems which have been rejected by the SCOTUS. One bill he supported, the Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA), was intended, allegedly, to ban discrimination by employers against LGBT’s. It would set quota systems though Perez denied that but how else could employers prove they are not biased?
Harasses Law Enforcement
In other cases, he has harassed the police and fire departments, demanding that quotas be put in place. He took on one case initiated by the DOJ in 2007. In that case, he said that black firefighter applicants who fail by as much as 70% must still be admitted to the fire academy.
In February 2011, Perez demanded damages for rejected applicants who scored 25 or higher on the 85-question exams. Taxpayers would be forced to pay compensation for incredibly under-qualified applicants solely because of their minority status. They would be hired with the seniority they would have earned had they been qualified.
Perez was President of Casa de Maryland, a radical pro-illegal immigration advocacy group. He supported benefits for illegals from “in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students to driver’s licenses. Casa de Maryland opposes enforcement of deportation orders, has protested post-9/11 coordination of local, state, and national criminal databases, and produced a ‘know your rights’ propaganda pamphlet for illegal aliens depicting federal immigration agents as armed bullies making babies cry.”
Even while serving in the DOJ, he volunteered for Casa de Maryland and received donations from George Soros’ Open Society and Hugo Chavez’ CITGO. Conflict of interest?
Perez was born in Buffalo, New York and received a bachelor’s degree from Brown University and then a JD from Harvard Law School.
He follows Debbie Wasserman-Schultz who resigned in disgrace. The temporary chair Donna Brazile also was outed as a liar by Podesta emails. She fed debate questions to Hillary during the primary against Bernie.
Perez received 235 votes in the second round of voting, ahead of Keith Ellison’s 200. With 435 members voting, the threshold for victory in the second round was 218 votes.
The threshold for winning the first vote was 214.5 votes, and Perez was just one vote shy of achieving that exact mark in the first round. He garnered 213.5 votes to Ellison’s 200, resulting in a second ballot.