In 2019, the Supreme Court told the state of Washington to reconsider its ruling against a Christian florist in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop ruling.
The florist, Arlene’s Flowers, had refused to sell flowers for a gay wedding because it violated her religious beliefs.
The Washington State Supreme Court did so and upheld their previous ruling against the Christian florist, claiming she violated their LGBT discrimination laws.
On Friday, the Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal from the Christian florist, with only three judges dissenting.
They heard the case of the cake baker so what gives?
Are they running scared after their ruling on behalf of Arizona’s voter integrity laws? The Left went bonkers over that and demanded Biden stack the court.
Kavanaugh and Barrett sided with the Leftists on the Court.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch said they would have agreed to hear the case and review the decision.
It’s an absolutely absurd decision by the Washington State Court and now it will be left standing. The marriage goes against her beliefs and these LGBT complaints are just harassing her. So, apparently, SCOTUS is okay with radical LGBTs harassing people.
So far, Kavanaugh and Barrett are a big disappointment.
We have been writing about this Washington baker and this florist for years. The florist, Barronelle Stutzman, is just religious, but she has been hounded for years by LGBT radicals.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Sadly, the bloom is off of ACB and comrade kommissar Kavanaugh.
Isn’t the baker in CO now under another round of struggle session for wrongthink thoughtcrime by not genuflecting to the enlightened progressive beings who are the first in human history to discover same sex attraction?
What a slap in the face for all those who stood up when both Kavanaugh and Barrett were being attacked for Their own beliefs and history. It shows Robert Barnes was right on the mark. It suggests the two do not want to be ‘burdened’ with repercussions for a decision by the perverts of society.