Sen. Cruz Nukes AG Garland Over Pro-Life Center Attacks, Terrorizing of Justices

5
101

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday became fiery when Sen. Ted Cruz tried to get an honest answer from AG Garland. Cruz (R-TX) accused the Justice Department chief of failing to protect conservative Supreme Court justices after they voted to overturn Roe v. Wade last summer.

Sen. Cruz wanted to know why two dozen heavily armed agents went to arrest pro-life activist Mark Houck, but he won’t prosecute people who firebomb pro-life centers. Garland claimed they couldn’t find the attackers of the pro-life facilities because they do it at night in the dark.

“When rioters descended on the homes of six Supreme Court Justices, night after night after night, you did nothing. The department did nothing,” Cruz said on Wednesday.

“How do you decide which statutes you enforce and which ones you don’t?” Cruz asked.

Garland said he sent 70 Marshals.

“The marshals on scene make that determination in light of the priority of,” Garland responded before being cut off by Cruz.

“The marshals do not make a determination on whether to prosecute,” the senator interjected. “You, the attorney general, make a determination, and you spent 20 years as a judge, and you’re perfectly content with justices being afraid for their children’s lives, and you did nothing to prosecute it.”

“Can I answer the question?” Garland shot back.

Cruz said, “No,” because he won’t answer the question.

If Garland had arrested these ‘protesters’ who terrorized Justice’s families, he would not have needed the 70 Marshals. Additionally, the law requires him to arrest them.

Garland insists he applies the law equally.

“You spent 20 years as a judge, and you’re perfectly content with [SCOTUS] justices being afraid for their children’s lives. You did nothing to prosecute it,” Cruz said.

We all know Jane’s Revenge was behind many attacks on pro-life facilities, but Garland still couldn’t find them.

Priorities, priorities

Merrick Garland complained about not having the resources to combat cartels flooding fentanyl into America. He didn’t bother to mention the open borders. He did take time to boast about his trips to Ukraine, meeting with their prosecutors, designating Wagner group a terrorist organization.

Senate Republicans questioned Garland on several of the department’s investigations, including one centered on President Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

Garland is expected to face additional hearings with the House Judiciary Committee, as Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) has pushed the DOJ to provide documents relating to investigations into Hunter Biden.

 

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
2 years ago

Corrupt RINO senators Mitch and Cornyn happily supported Garland to be the corrupt US AG.

Along with McConnell (R-Ky.), the Republicans who crossed over were Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Ia.), James Lankford (R-Ok.), Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), Joni Ernst (R-Ia.), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), John Thune (R-SD), Mitt Romney (R-Ut.), Rob Portman (R-Oh.), Jim Inhofe (R-Ok.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), John Cornyn (R-Tx.), Jerry Moran (R-Ks.). Thom Tillis (R-NC), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Susan Collins (R-Me.), Richard Burr (R-NC), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Lisa Murkowski (R-Ak.) and Mike Rounds (R-SD).

GuvGeek
2 years ago

Just Imagine if Merrick Garland was on the Supreme Court. Just defund and dismantle the DoJ and let State AGs prosecute Federal Crimes with Federal Funding. Defund the FBI and force them to request State Police to actually perform arrest. We don’t need Federal Police Forces, except maybe the US Marshal Service.

Papa
2 years ago

I’m waiting for the email from RNC and Cruz soliciting for donations! Which normally comes after this type of story.

Peter B. Prange
2 years ago
Reply to  Papa

Take your self off the solicitation lists by unsubscribing. (it is very easy: just go to the bottom of the email…). Then you will not need to complain to us in what seems to me to be a “false flag” attack on Senator Cruz. It even implies to me that I should consider Cruz to be only posturing so he can collect dollars.
For those who want a definition of “false flag” I will give an example: a law enforcement official, carrying a Trump Flag, inciting illegal activity to make Trump and his supporters look bad.
Papa may be innocent, but what he said is suspicious.

2 years ago

Sicker than most…