Shep Smith & Chris Wallace outdo each other with dishonest propaganda [videos]

4
1401

The [fake] โ€œjournalistsโ€ at The New York Times and other [left-wing] outlets applauded former Fox News host Shepard Smith during an anti-authoritarian leader speech at a dinner, the NY Times reported.

โ€œIntimidation and vilification of the press is now a global phenomenon. We donโ€™t have to look far for evidence of that,โ€ย Smith said as he spoke at the Committee to Protect Journalistsโ€™ annual fund-raising dinner, according to the New York Times.

That is true but not the way Shepherd Smith means it. Barack Obama and the Democrats are the ones who tried to silence honest journalism and reporters.

Obama wanted to control the flow of information and that was clear in the case of James Risen; Politico and the NY Times admitted they were manipulated by President Obama; Obamaย refused to honor FOIA requests;ย James Rosen and his family were spied on by Obama; Obama spied on the AP and bullied and threatened them, and that’s according to leftists.

I don’t know if you can call it propaganda if Smith believes what he says, but how can he? He obviously thinks Trump is the propagandist. However, to put the USA in the same category as say, Turkey, is a lie.

CHRIS WALLACE AND PROPAGANDA

Chris Wallace is a terrible reporter and pretends he’s a serious reporter. He pretends he’s unbiased and raves on about gossip as if it were factual. He doesn’t see any of the evidence on the right, as he says in the clip below, because Republicans aren’t allowed to present any. There is plenty of evidence but he won’t acknowledge it. At least Shep didn’t pretend he was a serious journalist.

During Thursdayโ€™s coverage of the House Intelligence Committeeโ€™s impeachment inquiry โ€œFox News Sundayโ€ anti-Trump host, Chris Wallace lied and said all the witnesses declared โ€œthat there was a quid pro quo.โ€

Wallace said, โ€œThey were very careful in what they said. I was particularly struck when Fiona Hill was asked about the July 25th phone call. She didnโ€™t even want to talk about it. This, of course, is the call the president released, itโ€™s been declassified. But she said I wasnโ€™t there for it. There are questions of executive privilege, and she was very, very careful in what she said. The point being that neither of them seems to come with any particular animus or any kind of political point of view.โ€

Oh sure, right, she’s good friends with Christopher Steele and she’s not unbiased???


Subscribe to the Daily Newsletter

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
4 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments