The Gaslighting Governor Will Cause Our Fuel Rates to Rise

9
205

When Gov. Kathy Hochul isn’t taxing people with congestive pricing, she’s extorts companies under the guise of climate change. A new bill will raise the costs of heating, cooling, manufacturing, and driving everything.

Without presenting any proof, she claims the money – $75 billion – will go to pay for damage allegedly caused by extreme weather events. It’s Marxist through and through.

Politicians have found their answer to spending all of our money — the climate change scam. It allows them to do anything they want. They’re in ‘pork and buying votes heaven.’

Naturally, the far-left papers with 99% far-left ‘journalists’ are all for it.

We do believe the earth is getting warmer, but it is not an emergency.

The New York Times

Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York on Thursday signed a law that requires companies that are big fossil fuel polluters to help pay to repair damage caused by extreme weather, which is becoming more common because of greenhouse gas emissions.

The legislation, called the Climate Change Superfund Act, mandates that the companies responsible for the bulk of carbon emissions buildup between 2000 and 2024 pay about $3 billion each year for 25 years.

“With nearly every record rainfall, heat wave, and coastal storm, New Yorkers are increasingly burdened with billions of dollars in health, safety, and environmental consequences due to polluters that have historically harmed our environment,” Governor Hochul said.

The law was modeled on the original Superfund law, which was established in 1980 and requires companies to pay for the cleanup of toxic waste wrought by incidents like oil and chemical spills.’

Kathy Hochul Lies

The grifting governor is pulling the same nonsense she pulled with congestive pricing. She was going to charge $15, and then she said she was saving us money when she reduced it to $9 (after the election). Now, this fuel law allegedly saves the consumer. Meanwhile, everyone knows these costs must be passed down to the consumer. At the same time, it hurts businesses and capitalism.

The Times:

The idea is to take some of the burden off taxpayers, who now are on the hook for financing much of the cleanup and mitigation efforts after weather disasters. The law takes particular aim at the oil and gas companies that produced more than one billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions globally over the last 24 years.

“Nothing could be fairer than making climate polluters pay,” said Lee Wasserman, the director of the Rockefeller Family Fund, a nonprofit that pushed for the passage of the law.

Climate change has become an extortion racket. Until people wake up to it, it will keep getting worse.

Powerline Blog:

U.S. greenhouse gas emissions fell again last year. They’re gaslighting us.

Chaser—here’s why restricting U.S. natural gas exports is stupid:

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 2 votes
Article Rating
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
New York No More
4 months ago

While the Marxist Dems are trying to negate our vote and overthrow our legitimate government, New York’s Governor Hochul is planning to charge the oil companies $75 billion for “climate change.” But if New Yorkers think energy prices are not going to go out of reach, consider this. New Yorkers would be required to pay $2000 per gallon of gasoline for the next 19-20 years in order for the energy companies to be able to regain their money from this “penalty.” And since people aren’t going to be able to afford that, there goes New York. And good riddance to any moron who voted for these fools.

Anonymous
4 months ago

Add Governor Inslee and Newscum to the list.

Sua Sponte
4 months ago

https://wattsupwiththat.com/the-global-temperature-record-says-we-are-in-a-climate-emergency/

The earth has gone through multiple periods of cold and hot before the industrial age, the “scientists” leave that out. The crux is that they attribute this to solely human activity. So what do they have to say about these much more damaging periods prior to the industrial age? Nothing, because that would punch holes in their narrative. Clearly, the global temperature data does not support the idea of a “climate emergency”, because when you view it on the proper scale of normal human experience, the steep rise in temperature disappears. The fallacy is using data, which ignores the cold temperatures during the Little Ice Age, and failing to mention that the late 40’s through mid-70’s was a period of slight cooling. And the fudged data they use erases that cooling period along with the long pause. Nor does it note that there have been multiple periods during the Modern Warm Period, starting in 1850, where there was warming, followed by plateaus/pauses. What caused this back when CO2 was under the “safe” level of 350ppm?

MicahStone
4 months ago

WRONG: “We do believe the earth is getting warmer…”
—SHAME ON YOU !!!!

Sua Sponte
4 months ago

The quickest and easiest way for the companies to settle this is to completely stop selling fuel, oil, etc to the state and local government and let them set the example for others. I mean if it’s this important they should have no issue with it. You want to go after me for some non-existent tripe, fine, we just won’t sell to the cities and states that want to push this. Same thing goes for law suits.