This Is the Speaker’s Unconstitutional Plan for the Articles of Impeachment

6
1854

When a party, an ideological movement, and an entire political agenda are based on hatred, people and policies become warped. The left-wing loathing of Trump has now tainted almost every Democrat’s agenda and unhinged most of the party’s major players.

~ Victor Davis Hanson, AmericanGreatness

Democrats have no Constitutional mandate to impeach the President and it’s not patriotic either. The socialist Democrats absurdly claim the President is not above the law and that they are enveloped in the rule of law. Their claims belie their actions as they abuse the Constitution, a practice which blossomed under Barack Obama.

Democrats don’t believe in due process, facts, the presumption of innocence, and following the Constitution’s rules on impeachment.

SHE WILL HOLD BACK THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT INDEFINITELY

Democrats are holding the articles of impeachment back until Sen. McConnell agrees to their demands on the process — they want to retry the impeachment. That will be indefinitely under the circumstances since McConnell made it clear that their rules are unacceptable.

Pelosi says she won’t choose impeachment managers or send them to Senate until the Senate agrees on trial rules: “When we see what they have, we’ll know who and how many to send over.”

Withholding the articles of impeachment deprives the President of due process. It’s not constitutional. She can delay for a while, but not indefinitely as she hopes.

Democrat minions have spied on the President, attempted to damage the presidency and the balance of power, and it’s been three years of fury and hate. They wanted this impeachment to add to that. These people are seditious. Now they want to deprive him of the opportunity to be acquitted.

The withholding of the articles of impeachment is a mystery to the Sentinal, actually. We were told the President is a “clear and present danger” and has to be impeached and removed, but they’re delaying? How can this be? Aren’t they terrified? Jennifer Rubin wrote in The Washington Post this week that the President’s letter to Speaker Nancy was “frightening and terrifying.”

This delay is inexplicable, given their descriptions of the President.

Clyburn thinks they can hold the articles back indefinitely.

NO MORE QUESTIONS ON IMPEACHMENT, JUST COMPLIMENTS

During her presser today, Pelosi refused to answer any more questions about impeachment and insisted the media ask about Democrat accomplishments. The media complied even though Democrats accomplished nothing. On Wednesday night, the Speaker and her comrades impeached the President and on Thursday, she said she doesn’t want to talk about it anymore.

Pelosi said her accomplishments include the USMCA.

She said she gets the credit for the USMCA trade deal because she had to make changes to it. Yet, it was President Trump who did all the work with Mexico and Canada. Nancy has been holding onto that deal for a year now and America lost a lot of money because of it. In addition, she made the deal a little worse by taking copyright protections off drugs.

By the way, as Democrats were spending the day impeaching the President for non-crimes with no victims, the Senate approved 13 more judges.

The nearly-80-year-old Nancy stammered that she doesn’t care what Republicans think. [And, Republicans don’t care what she thinks.]

Nancy is no longer pretending she is sad and solemn. In fact, she has a “spring in her step.”

BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IN HER HEAD

Pelosi believes she has bipartisan support, probably because the one Independent, Justin Amash, voted to impeach. Only Republicans can say that they have bipartisan support. Two Democrats voted with Republicans and one other voted with the GOP on one amendment.

DEMS LOVE THE FOUNDING FATHERS NOW

Why is she quoting Thomas Paine in this next clip? Isn’t he one of those old, elitist white guys that Democrats hate so? She is comical as Sen. McConnell indicated today.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
herbert r richmond
Member
herbert r richmond
3 years ago

The woman is delusional and very evil, a trickster with words, just like her master, Satan himself.

Zigmont
Guest
Zigmont
3 years ago

OK Nancy so you are doing a quid pro quo ” ‘something in exchange for something else’ isn’t that special you clown, that’s what you bone heads accused Trump of doing, oh and one other thing Nancy a bunch of your hypocrite clowns in the house want Sen McConnell to recuse himself from anything to do with this witch hunt, so Booker, Bernie, Warren, Klobuchar, Harris should recuse themselves from a vote in the senate because Trump is their political rival !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Shirley Van de Haven
Guest
Shirley Van de Haven
3 years ago

John Acord says it all. When do the Democrats stop playing games?

The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner
3 years ago

She slurs and misses words. She is a known botox user. Botox has the same agent that produces botulism. It is a neurotoxin which causes difficulty speaking.

John Acord
Guest
John Acord
3 years ago

Why does anyone have to wait on P elosi? They voted their articles of impeachment and the Senate can now convene the trial. If the Commiecrats want to send “managers” they can,if they don’t then its a default on their part not the Senate. Where Is it written in the Constitution the Senate has to wait on the House “to deliver” their horrendous, abusive decision to the Senate.? Let’s get it on and start calling witnesses, No 1 and 2 are the Biden’s. If they don’t show up Trump can send marshals to arrest them. Pelosi had her show now is time for the denouement and it won’t be pretty.