Trump was right when he said many DACA are not angels

7
766

There was a kerfuffle yesterday when President Trump tweeted that DACA are not all angels.

Ann Coulter, who was never for Donald Trump, announced she is not for Donald Trump.

President Trump was right again it seems. Allegedly, people with criminal histories are not considered for DACA. That appears to not be true.

MANY ARE NOT ANGELS

On the USCIS page, dated June 2018 under “New Data Shows Criminal Arrest Histories of DACA Requestors,” DACA requestors/applicants with criminal records were approved for the program.

Almost 8 percent — 59,786 individuals — had arrest records by that date and they were approved. The arrests included assault, drunk driving, rape, murder and so on. A total of 53,792 were arrested before they were approved.

This next figure is stunning: 199 individuals who requested DACA had 10 or more arrests. Of those, 51 most recently had DACA case status of “approved,” as of the date the systems were queried.

The report appears to show a policy of allowing felons to receive protection.

People with criminal arrests for sexually assaulting a minor, kidnapping, human trafficking, child pornography, and even murder have received protection from removal. The courts won’t let us change this policy. Criminals are allowed to remain as DACA.

“Yet the courts rule that we are unable to change this policy – even though those with criminal histories are getting through the system and permitted to remain in the country, despite having a high number of arrests for any types of crimes before or after receiving DACA protection,” said USCIS Director L. Francis Cissna.

“There are legitimate concerns over a portion of the population who have requested, and been granted, the privilege of a temporary stay of their removal under the illegal DACA policy. Until it can be repealed, this criminality data only reinforces the need for its continued review and scrutiny, which was imposed unilaterally by the Obama administration in circumventing Congress. It’s our hope that it helps the public and policymakers better understand the reality of the entire DACA population,” Cissna added.

Immigration services are not following its own rules. By their rules, they can reject those who are threats to “public safety and national security.” There are other discretionary factors as well.

Are bureaucrats rubber-stamping these approvals? Is it another way to hurt the President’s agenda?

Meanwhile, some Democrat candidates are calling to abolish ICE so there is no enforcement in the interior

READ THE REPORT HERE


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RufusVonDufus
Guest
RufusVonDufus
4 years ago

Round up all of the DACA and send them packing back to their beloved Meheeeeeko!

mlopez414@outlook.com
Guest
mlopez414@outlook.com
4 years ago

Not angels and definitely not legal either. If they were abused it was by the people who brought them here.

Elena McCoy
Guest
Elena McCoy
4 years ago

The SC supposedly is ruling not on the legality of DACA but in the way that the president tried to stop it (as I understood). So no deal before the ruling. If they decide what the president did was not right, which they could, he needs to pass another executive order to stop it. Any deal should include complete immigration reform.

herbert r richmond
Member
herbert r richmond
4 years ago

This is just the beginning of turning the entire country ‘Blue’, in favor of the Tyrannical Democrats, it will be a miracle if Trump is re-elected.

Pilot Dave
Guest
Pilot Dave
4 years ago

Herbert, the continuous clown show in Congress all but FedEx’s the 2020 election to President Trump. Just another illegal attempted coupe.

Our US Constitution requires very little of Congress. One being, an annual budget each year… We have not had one since the last year of GW Bush. FAILURE of Congress to do their most basic job.

Patricia
Guest
Patricia
4 years ago

Why are we supposed to care what this woman thinks?

Pilot Dave
Guest
Pilot Dave
4 years ago
Reply to  Patricia

Ann who? I used to remember who she was… TDS is strong with that RINO.