Tucker responds to Roger Stone’s biased attack-Judge

6
1348

Roger Stone’s judge went after Tucker Carlson earlier today during a Stone hearing. She wants to silence Tucker Carlson the way she silenced Roger Stone.

She apparently didn’t like him calling the foreperson of Stone’s jury, Tameka Hart, an anti-Trump zealot.

Jackson was a bit threatening, claiming Tucker was harassing or intimidating Hart. All he did was describe her vicious tweets before she became a juror. It’s especially concerning since Hart appeared to have lied on her questionnaire over exactly that.

Jackson said, “Tucker Carlson accused the foreperson of the jury of being an anti-Trump zealot…Any attempts to invade the privacy of the jurors or to harass or intimidate them is completely antithetical to our system of justice.”

No one invaded this woman’s privacy.

Tucker did not back down, calling her a “disgrace.” He said she is “corrupt” and an “authoritarian’ with” no self-awareness.’

Tucker and Judge Jeanine both responded:

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kulak Acres Farms
5 years ago

Remember when the comrades showed up outside Tucker’s home because of wrongthink thoughtcrime?
The Kulak Deplorables remember.

5 years ago

Great job Tucker expose the crooked Judge

Paraclete
5 years ago

Tucker, like Trump, is being attacked for masterfully exposing
participants of a double standard justice system for all to see.

Vin
5 years ago

The leftist misfit judge can, of course, attack anyone, journalists, Barr, … , conduct a biased trial, have an obvious biased foreperson, gag the accused even after the trial, submit cheap attacks on Trump, Barr, and others into the official trial record, …. , and, of course, Barr will nothing.

As far as I am concerned, I hope Barr gets continually attacked, because he as a coward deserves it.

All Barr had to do was the obvious, submit a request for a mistrial and the judge would have had little choice, instead, he played possum and let justice suffer.

HonorAmerica
5 years ago

The judge knows Tucker spoke the truth. The judge is afraid she may lose her judgeship for her own ineptitude and bias. A mistrial can be declared because or the overt and well known prejudice of that juror. You can’t be tried twice for the same crime so that voids Stone’s overtly severe sentencing. the judge who is a pompous ass is embarrassed and now trying to do exactly what she accused Tucker of. doing. Judge Jackson is a self important shrew, with control issues and likes to throw her weight around. As for Hart she should be brought up on charges of lying under oath as a juror with extreme bias.

John Vieira
5 years ago
Reply to  HonorAmerica

At least !!!