US Attorney Charges Russian Trump Tower Lawyer in a Separate Case



Natalia V. Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer who in 2016 met with Trump campaign officials in Trump Tower, was charged on Tuesday in a separate case that showed her close ties to the Kremlin, according to the NY Times.


She was charged with obstruction of justice in a case unrelated to Trump Tower, but she is the Russian attorney who met with Trump’s team, including his son, son-in-law, and campaign manager for a 20-minute meeting in Trump Tower. That meeting caused a constant swirl of controversy and accusations against the President’s son and the President.

Ms. Veselnitskaya was charged by federal prosecutors in New York with seeking to thwart a Justice Department civil fraud investigation into money laundering that involved an influential Russian businessman and his investment firm.

The federal indictment returned in Manhattan seemed to confirm that Ms. Veselnitskaya had deep ties to senior Russian government officials.


Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz said the case looks solid, but the question will be is this a selective prosecution?

Dershowitz said there are two real problems. One, the U.S. Attorneys’ office almost never brings indictments against misleading affidavits submitted in civil cases. Two, the U.S. attorney is the victim here so for them to selectively choose this case to prosecute raises some questions.

Finally, Dershowitz asked, is this just an effort to turn the screws to her to get her to talk about the Trump Tower meeting? It wouldn’t be illegal, but it raises questions.

Ironically, it was Obama’s Department of Justice that allowed her into the country under “extraordinary circumstances” before she ever met with Trump’s team. She also met with Fusion GPS, Hillary’s opposition research team, before and immediately after the Trump Tower meeting.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 years ago

This is one BIG GIANT FRAUD. This is the case that Browder fabricated in order to avoid taxes. Browder admitted in his deposition in the Prevezon case that Magnitsky was not an attorney but an accountant. He did NOT search out the “best attorney”, rather Magnitsky worked for his company. It wasn’t Magnitsky who uncovered fraud, but a low-level employee who went to the police well before Browder’s timeline. This was indicated on Hermitage’s own website, before they took the site down. The site is archived although. Something is quite suspicious in making this case. Many are investigating this travesty and this could be a means to silence any opposition to Browder. This man is notorious in keeping any revelations hid from public view. The key was in the website, because Browder begins his accusations with the “best attorney” claim.

This is a great opportunity to blow the lid off this fraud and all the repercussions that stemmed from it. It was Browder who lobbied for the Magnitsky Act to be applied worldwide and has International ramifications. It may also reveal the high-stakes fraud by international companies who profited immensely by Russia’s opening of their market economy. It’s also possible those transactions is what caused Putin to take power in response.