Warren plans a bill to forgive college loans with other peoples’ money


Fake Indian Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.) announced on Wednesday their plan to introduce legislation in the House and Senate to eliminate up to $50,000 in student loan debt for 42 million Americans.

Her campaign is stalled and she feels this will bring her needed support.

These two don’t have any money so they will confiscate it from wealthy people who have nothing to do with the loans. They didn’t take out the loans but are expected to pay debts of others they don’t know.

“It’s time to decide: Are we going to be a country that only helps the rich and powerful get richer and more powerful, or are we going to be a country that invests in its future?” Warren said, in a statement.

How generous of her. The only problem is she is unabashedly stealing the money from others.


Borrowers with household incomes under $100,000 would be eligible to have $50,000 of their student debt scrubbed.

People who earn between $100,000 and $250,000 would be eligible for less forgiveness. For example, Warren writes, “a person with household income of $130,000 gets $40,000 in cancellation, while a person with household income of $160,000 gets $30,000 in cancellation.”

The plan would cost $1.25 trillion over the next decade, according to her campaign. The entire cost would be covered by an “Ultra-Millionaire Tax,” a 2% annual levy that she wants to impose of 75,000 American families with $50 million or more in wealth, she said.

Warren’s answer for every problem is to steal money from people who she doesn’t think deserve it to give to people she selects. She will forgive the debt with other peoples’ money to teach the recipients they can borrow money and someone else will pay it back.

She has no solution for the problem of future students who run up debt, so the problem will continue.

The rich pay enough now and if they have to pay more, they will do what they always do, find ways to protect their money and keep it out of the sight of the greedy frauds in government.

  • It was predictable should would try to buy the young. Many are sitting around with huge debt and low skill jobs. Plus she is also trying to subsidize the schools which produce these unskilled people.

  • How is it “investing in the future” means those who didn’t indebt themselves for student loans so students could go to college and major in useless non career fields like, African-American studies, Hispanic culture studies, Women’s studies, Homosexual studies, etc. which guaranteed there are few if any jobs out there for these fools, “investing in the future” means those who didn’t take on this debt must pay it back? And what kind of “future” will graduates of this drivel create? There must not be any oversight for what these loans can be used for because I have even read students have taken this money to use for “spring break” party vacations and other non academic reasons.
    We never heard much about this issue until Obama took student loans away from the private sector that probably used oversight for what the loans could be used for and turned it over to the federal government that doesn’t.

  • Won’t it reach a point where a college edumactions become worthless? Wymyn’s studies degrees and basket weaving are great for professors to ride on the gravy train of edu money but they have zero application in the real world.

  • Hiawatha lives in a $5 Million house, I believe. Maybe she can sell it and pay for college loans for several snowflakes.