You Will Rent to Criminals, You Racist!


evil Obama


Disparate impact is the irrational Progressive-Civil Rights idea that only impact should be considered in all things and Obama is unleashing it on housing. Disparate impact is an insidious legal concept that is no friend to Capitalism. This entire effort is a small part of Obama’s re-engineering of neighborhoods throughout the nation.

Legal challenges to disparate impact have found that the concept can be one factor but not the sole factor. Barack Obama, looking at a future leftist Supreme Court is making it the sole factor. He will fine landlords but will the statists move to stealing property as punishment?

The Obama administration is warning landlords that they may be discriminating by not renting or selling homes to criminals. He is making criminals into a protected class because many are minorities. It’s now racism to not rent or sell a home to someone with a criminal record.

Obama’s Fair Housing Act doesn’t yet specify criminals are a protected class, but they are moving in that direction. HUD has a rule saying not renting or selling to criminals is a form of racial discrimination because there are more minorities in prison.

On November 2, President Barack Obama announced new actions to promote the rehabilitation and reintegration for formerly-incarcerated inmates. The Administration’s criminal justice reform efforts included new pilot efforts dedicated to housing people coming out of prison. Along with that, came new HUD rules making it difficult to not rent to criminals.

“The Fair Housing Act prohibits both intentional housing discrimination and housing practices that have an unjustified discriminatory effect because of race, national origin, or other protected characteristics,” say HUD’s newly-released guidelines. “Because of widespread racial and ethnic disparities in the U.S. criminal justice system, criminal history-based restrictions on access to housing are likely disproportionately to burden African-Americans and Hispanics. While the Act does not prohibit housing providers from appropriately considering criminal history information when making housing decisions, arbitrary and overbroad criminal history-related bans are likely to lack a legally sufficient justification.”

The guidance urges PHAs (Public Housing Authorities) and owners to exercise discretion before making such a decision and to consider all relevant circumstances, including the seriousness of the crime and the effect an eviction of an entire household would have on family members not involved in the criminal activity. In decisions about household members with criminal records for drug use, PHAs and property owners are encouraged to consider whether the person is attending or has successfully completed a drug rehabilitation program or has otherwise been rehabilitated successfully.

Additionally, the guidance reminds PHAs and property owners of the due process rights of tenants and applicants applying for housing assistance. Federal law requires that PHAs provide public housing and Section 8 applicants with notification about, and the opportunity to dispute the accuracy and relevance of, any criminal record before the PHA or owner denies admission or assistance.

What exactly does that mean? It means that landlords will feel compelled to rent to criminals, who we at the Sentinel are defining as people with criminal records, because any criminal who sues will have a serious advantage under Progressives.

It also means we can turn all housing into The Projects.

People who have paid their dues and don’t have a mile long rap sheet shouldn’t be confused with hardened criminals but landlords should not have to decide which criminals they are not allowed to deny an apartment to because the first lawsuit in which the anti-American ACLU represents the criminal, a landlord will be hit with a large fine and mandated to do it. That’s how this goes.

Private renters should be allowed to rent to whomever they want but not in the Obamahood where his new rules are intended to put Section 8 in wealthy neighborhoods and criminals everywhere.

Disparate Impact Is No Friend to Capitalism



0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
6 years ago

Ok Zackman, I’ll play. Please tell me how many of the 600+ homicides in Chicago this year were likely committed by whites? Please be honest with yourself. Over 98% of the victims were people of color. If Black Lives Matter so much then why isn’t the media and the BLM movement doing more to bring attention to and stop black on black violence? Where is our precious Obama at renouncing these killings and the gangbanger lifestyle? I do believe that sometimes blacks are unfairly treated in the justice system due to the (true)stereotype of such a small minority committing such a high percentage of crimes-however I also believe that blacks must truly shed and condemn the lifestyle that leads to the problem. Dr King would not be proud of today’s black urban population.
As far as renting goes. I believe if you own the property you should be allowed to refuse anyone for any reason be it race, religion, sexual preference, etc. America is supposed to be a free country. Sadly it’s not.

6 years ago

Man are you racists dumb!

I mean it’s pretty common knowledge that blacks are incarcerated at higher rates for crimes than whites even if they both commit the same crime in the same circumstances. You can see this disparity most noticeably in drug convictions. Although whites use illicit substances at a much higher rate than blacks since these substances are less trafficked such as hallucinogens or painkillers they are not convicted at even half the rates of blacks. A lot of this is due to the fact blacks tend to live in more highly policed areas and often can’t afford the same legal defense a white person could. Blacks plead guilty more often than whites even if they didn’t commit the crime because the probability of loosing the case solely because of a poor public defender and getting the more severe sentence coerces them.

This law makes a lot of sense when you consider that having a place of residence greatly reduces criminal recidivism. You’re other option is having ex-cons who want to reform live on the streets and being driven back into crime to survive.

Obama is right.