Erick Erickson said today that Trump would lose the immunity case and that his lawyer wasn’t good, not having answers to the Justice’s questions. Erickson said there is no way Donald Trump will win this case. The argument is that the president has to be impeached before he can be criminally prosecuted, and Erickson said it is a ridiculous argument.
Trump’s lawyer didn’t have a good answer to the question asked by the lower court: Can he order SEAL Team Six to go out and kill his rival?
Erickson believes Trump’s lawyers are okay with losing the case. What they are doing is running out the clock. He thinks Trump could lose 9-0. His lawyers think Donald Trump will win in November, and these cases won’t matter.
Erickson believes everyone is missing the point and trying to make it to the election. While he’s in office, everything will be paused. He also sees this case being ruled on and additional appeals to follow.
Alvin Bragg is scuttling his own case, and Fani is doing the same to hers. That’s why Jack Smith is trying to rush his cases, says Erickson, especially the documents case. It’s the strongest case, he says.
Erickson said all these cases will take a long time, and Bragg’s is a joke.
Julie Kelly said the Justices don’t seem to feel Presidents should be criminally prosecuted for functions of office. The problem comes when considering who makes that decision.
@julie_kelly2 summarizes today’s U.S. Supreme Court proceedings: “The majority of justices indicated they believe presidents should not be criminally prosecuted, at least for what are deemed official acts or core functions of the presidency.”pic.twitter.com/RIGZch9GKU
— NanLee Marie Carissimi (@NanLee1124) April 25, 2024
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Erickson is an anti Trump fanatic. Who cares what he says.
Doesn’t anyone realize nothing matters anymore? All three branches of government are bought and owned. They have only to “sauce” the sheeple geese with lunatic schoolyard bully tactics that everyone dismisses as relevant anyways. Schoolyard spectators learned nothing from their formative “daze” watching bullies get away with their shizzel and occasionally heros showing up to smash bullies so spectators never… Read more »
This site often covers Erickson, who is not a credible person. He was the first never Trumper, never giving a reason, other than Trump is mean. He uses the typical leftist slants to attack Trump, and always has. For example, Trump says bad people come across the border, so he is racist. With that illogic, why pay attention to him?… Read more »
Unless Brandon orders a jailhouse hit on Trump. In that case, Nothing would happen. Look the other way. Wray, Garland and Schumer always look away from their fellow cult members. There would be no trial.
Erickson says Sauer is not a good lawyer??
That is strange because I have the exact opposite opinion, I think Sauer is very good.
I cannot edit so I’m replying to my self When I watched hours of the committee on the weaponisation of the federal government, and I heard Sauer explain what they had found at Twiter ( which was shocking ) , the way he talked, the man is obviously very intelligent and he is very knowledgeable. I am very surprised anyone… Read more »
We are supposed to believe that a billionaire former president who has had teams of lawyers under him for many years hired a bad lawyer, and will lose 9-0 because he has no case for immunity, though the Constitution calls for a completely separate investigative and prosecution mechanism for presidents.
I am no expert but I am pretty sure a president has the right to ask that things be investigated, even an election. I googled it and the top result is from 2018, from the Chicago Tribune, thus not about elections, but it confirms that yes a US president has that right. here is an excerpt, ” … The Constitution… Read more »