Fight for Possible MS-13 Gang Member Abrego Garcia

5
457

Federal Obama-appointed judge Paula Xinis ordered Trump to bring alleged MS-13 gang member back to the US from El Salvador by April 7th deadline. The White House has said US courts can’t order th return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month. They didn’t realize a judge’s order of protection from 2019 was still in effect. He was allegedly entitled to notice and an interview. A whistleblower said he was an MS-13 leader and Garcia was allowed to stay because he said he would be persecuted in El Salvador. The administration has evidence that he was engaged in human trafficking in the United States.

Abrego Garcia’s attorneys countered that there is no evidence he was in MS-13. The allegation is based on a confidential informant’s claim in 2019 that Abrego Garcia was a member of a chapter in New York, where he has never lived.

All the media reports say that he was sent by mistake and that he’s the father of three, and one of his children is handicapped.

Democrats and the judicial authoritarians running our government want million-dollar trials for all these illegal aliens.

The judge said “This case is certainly important to Abrego Garcia and his family. In recognition of that, I feel like I can’t wait on giving my order.“

The judge said that the Trump officials failed to present sufficient evidence.

Judges run our government, and they get people killed all the time. Let’s hope Garcia doesn’t commit any crimes if he comes back.

Stephen Miller said he is here illegally, and that is true. He also noted that he is MS-13. On top of that, he is implicated in human trafficking. However, Garcia had a permit from the Department of Homeland Security to work in the US legally, his attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said. He served as a sheet metal apprentice and was pursuing his journeyman license.

His family said he fled El Salvador around 2011 because he and his family were facing threats by local gangs.

The only right he had was to an interview. He still would have been deported. The man was here illegally and had no right to demand residence. Both the original immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals found there was sufficient evidence of such to render him a danger to the public.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ThinkAboutIt
1 month ago

So what happens if the order is ignored on appeal? That jacka$$ Roberts wants the courts flooded with appeals of these judges invalid orders so he can rule the order is invalid for each one. A better approach would be for Roberts to order a blanket injunction on any order like this pending appeal from the Justice Department.

The Prisoner
1 month ago
Reply to  ThinkAboutIt

That’s it, Roberts does not want to solve the problem, he still wants to find some cases to rule against Trump on, instead of a blanket ruling. Roberts is well aware that the district judges have no power to do what they are trying to do.

The Prisoner
1 month ago

The precedent to ignore judges was set with clown Boasberg. Nothing happened. Boasberg seems intent on ordering the arrest of some Trump officials. (If Bondi were crazy enough to try to arrest Trump officials, based on Boasberg’s demands, she would destroy herself. Bondi’s method is passive resistance of Trump, not active resistance.)

It’s impossible that Trump will bring this man back. Noem is an effective leader, following the Trump agenda, she would never let that happen. Roberts and Barrett have stained themselves enough, they could not rule to bring the man back and face people.

Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  The Prisoner

“…and face people.” Lest we forget, the ‘left’ ARE shameless…

Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  The Prisoner

The US has permission to “deposit” prisoners in El Salvador, but not to “withdraw” them. This prisoner now “belongs” to El Salvador and can be removed only if El Salvador agrees, and the prisoner may be returned to the US only if the US agrees. (This is logic speaking; I have no idea what the law says.)