NATO Expansionism Before & After the Soviet Empire Fell

10
215

View the original on this link.

In 1949, there were 12 NATO members.
    1. Belgium
    2. Canada
    3. Denmark
    4. France
    5. Iceland
    6. Italy
    7. Luxembourg
    8. Netherlands
    9. Norway
    10. Portugal
    11. The United Kingdom
    12. The United States
In 1952, 13, Greece and 14, Turkey were added.
1955 brought 15. West Germany into the fold.
1982, 16. Spain was added.
In 1999, no longer obliged to the Warsaw Pact, former Soviet allies turned their eyes toward NATO. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Warsaw Pact no longer obligated the US. The nations formerly under Soviet control never wanted to be in that position again and looked to NATO for security.
Three former Warsaw Pact members were admitted into NATO:

17. The Czech Republic (formerly Czechoslovakia)

18. Hungary

19. Poland

2004

2004 brought the largest increase in NATO members since the Alliance’s foundation. Perhaps even more notable, though, is republics formerly of the Soviet Union were now joining (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania).

    1. Bulgaria (formerly of the Warsaw Pact)
    1. Estonia
    1. Latvia
    1. Lithuania
    1. Romania (formerly of the Warsaw Pact)
    1. Slovakia
    1. Slovenia (successor to Yugoslavia)
2009 
In 2009, NATO’s foothold in Eastern Europe grew firmer:

27. Albania (formerly of the Warsaw Pact)

28. Croatia (successor to Yugoslavia)

2017 and 2020 
These additions to NATO are both successor states to Yugoslavia:
    1. Montenegro (in 2017)
    1. North Macedonia (in 2020)
2023 and 2024

The Russo-Ukrainian War, and the escalation of which beginning on February 24, 2022, brought NATO’s growth into the foreground of foreign policy debates at the time. Russia’s full-scale invasion also prompted Finland and Sweden to officially apply and were eventually accepted into the alliance.

    1. Finland (in 2023)

    2. Sweden (in 2024)

With NATO recognizing Bosnia and Herzegovina (successor to Yugoslavia), Georgia, and Ukraine (both former Soviet Republics) as aspiring members, does Russia’s leadership feel a pressure of NATO coming right up to their western doorstep?  Read more at NDISC (the Notre Dame International Security Center.

The man in this clip is wise:

None of this shows our presence in Ukraine, which included Biolabs. It also doesn’t reflect Western interference in Ukraine since 2014.

The current debate centers around a difference of opinion. Ukraine wants to be in NATO or have the same security guarantees as being a NATO member. On the other side is Donald Trump who doesn’t want to remain in Ukraine risking World War.

NATO is an enormous, expensive bureaucracy that no longer follows its mission as a North Atlantic Defensive Alliance. It is belligerent, and its leaders overturn governments. It doesn’t make anyone safe, but pro-NATO activists will tell you it is necessary.

Russia ruthlessly invaded and Zelensky turned it into a human meat grinder.

We need Russia and Ukraine at the bargaining table.


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
The Prisoner
2 months ago

That map is informative. It really is that obvious. And in recent years the US government has become more explicit in its desire to disintegrate Russia. High level officials such as Nuland, Graham, …. actually advocating that.

Echo1
Echo1
2 months ago

How did Zelinski Insult anyone? I saw Vance Insulting Him by Attacking like a Sick Dog. Trump looked like a Gorilla! He must be using tactics he used on his laborors on his Building Projects! School Yard Tactics!

Why does Zelinski OWE YOU ANYTHING? He is fighting the WAR you Caused! However, it is early … Perhaps, soon, America, Youll be Dragged into this War kicking and screaming! Your Medicine; because YOU caused this War. You funded and Pushed Ukraine into Revolution and Guided them to War with Russia. Who do you think youre going to Fool? US AID was all over Ukraine. Obama and that Nutcase Bolten! Sure … You were over there feeding the homeless like you do in America! IF there is a GOD, America, Your Day is Coming!

M Walker
M Walker
2 months ago
Reply to  Echo1

Apparently, you didn’t watch the full 50 minutes of the coked-up “President” of Ukraine.

Echo1
Echo1
2 months ago
Reply to  M Walker

First … If any of you had Discernment youd know that NO FOREIGN DIGNITARY would go on "Candid Camera" for what is supposed to be a Closed Door Negotiation. Trump set Z up , and it looked like a Couple of School Yard Bullies ( Trump/Vance with Trump sitting there like a Gorilla) attacking a Lackey! Z must be on the Payroll. He actually took it!

Id have got up and walked out of that Nonsense if I were Z. Trump would get NO MINERALS. NO PEACE. And, I`d get all I needed from UK/EU, and turn to a real winning Strategy against Russia: Unconventional Warfare in Depth Defense. Russia would eventually concede.

Z , the US, and all who supported UKRAINE were all Stupid for trying to tackle russia in conventional warfare. All of US/NATO would be lucky to achieve such a Lofty Goal! Ukraine had no Airforce and No Air-Defense. Putin was Stupid for not taking all of Ukraine in the First Week.

So … I say the whole thing STINKS and it seems “all sides” are playing games, and getting RICH, off the murder of Innocents.

The Prisoner
The Prisoner
2 months ago
Reply to  Echo1

We see you are back with your comic book theories.

You are so desperate to support NWO/CIA/MIC policies and destroy Russia that you advocate guerrilla war.

You again try to distract from the subject, indicating deception.

Last edited 2 months ago by The Prisoner
Echo 1
Echo 1
2 months ago
Reply to  The Prisoner

What is Wrong with pointing out things you all missed?
Someone has to do it.

I could have made a MINT buying “Defense Stocks;” while biden was pumping them up selling your Treasury to the MIC. However, I stayed out of it, entirely. I would not put my name on that bloody dirt.

I am not advocating a guerrilla war , I am just pointing out the obvious option. Cheaper too! And, it would be better than the stupidity of Ukraine challenging Russia conventionally. That plan was just plain stupid. I`d like to meet the dolts who dreamed that nonsense up, really!

You do not want an Echo-Chamber , do you? Your Brains will Shrink if you do not exercise them. I am doing all of you a favor and helping you. I am good for your Brain. I am good for your blood pressure! I increase the bloodflow around your brains giving you extra brain power to insult me! I give all of you a Testosterone Boost! I am your best friend.

Now, Try and Debate Content.

The Prisoner
The Prisoner
2 months ago
Reply to  Echo1

As a propagandist, you of course divert from the subject, which is the western instigation of the war. No sale.

Greg
Greg
2 months ago

This is how it started. Of course the detractors downplay the remarks because it was in a wider context but it was the start to Kiev going after every ethnic Russian. TV commentators, guests and politicians wanted ethnic cleansing.

It was after this that the first legislation was to outlaw the Russian language. Crimea then votes to leave Ukraine and go with Russia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRso46iepho

Rod Martin
Rod Martin
2 months ago

If you look at the history of nato and how the soviets viewed having a buffer between them and nato at some point Russia had to push back .
So blame it on Russia but at least recognize that the US and Europe were the bullies on the school yard pushing and daring Russia to do something about it. Then they did.
The US needs to take of the US first then the rest of the world .
Looks to me like the rest of the world is just using us for a piggy bank. They are not our friends

Last edited 2 months ago by Rod Martin
The Prisoner
The Prisoner
2 months ago
Reply to  Rod Martin

Blame it on the bullies.