President Trump said he will not sign the Housing bill, and that is a good thing. It still could be passed if Congress has enough votes. Hopefully not. As usual, the New York Times isn’t telling the truth about the bill.
The New York Times is never to be believed; they regularly lie by omission to push its agenda, which now appears to be DSA communism. They are painting the housing bill as the first real bipartisan effort to build new housing.
First of all, they leave out the fact that we need the housing because millions of third-world illegal aliens were allowed to pour in. Secondly, and more importantly, Elizabeth Warren ruined the bill
The Warren changes allow the government to put crime-ridden Section 8 housing in nice neighborhoods. The nice neighborhoods are the ones people of all races move to so they can escape crime. The creates thousands of low-income homes and projects in nice neighborhoods.
Additionally, the bill allows the government to determine density. So all you people who bought your acre, three-acre lots could find yourselves surrounded by apartment buildings that will lower your home value.
She also included a clause allowing the government to regulate temperatures in privately owned buildings. The government gets to control the temperature in your house.
The bill is a disaster.
This is how the New York Times put it:
A major bipartisan housing bill that President Trump has dismissed as a “yawn” appears set to become law without his signature late tonight, weeks after he surprised congressional Republicans by suddenly canceling his plans to sign it. (He could always sign it, or it could fall to a veto, today.)
The bill is the first genuine effort the federal government has made in over 30 years to build more housing, the problem at the heart of the nation’s persistent housing crisis, says my colleague Ronda Kaysen, who has been covering its passage.
The entire article avoided giving the public the information they needed.
