This is Abdul El Sayed’s real opinion on 9/11, which was revealed on September 11, 2021. He said 9/11 scarred the nation, but it scarred millions of others afterward.
Uh, no. According to statistics, the people most abused for immutable characteristics or religion are, first, Black people, and second, Jewish people. Islamists don’t even come close.
The Islamophobia mantra is grotesquely exaggerated. El-Sayed wants to make 9/11 about Islamists as victims.
🚨 Abdul El-Sayed in unearthed audio:
“9/11 scarred our country in profound ways, but what we did after 9/11 scarred millions of other people.”
“When we talk about 9/11, we often fail to center them.” pic.twitter.com/Xa8XOY2Tdb
— Bobby LaValley (@Bobby_LaVallley) September 8, 2026
The Islamophobia fraud.
The term Islamophobia hit the vernacular in about 1910. However, it meant something different from today’s definition. It referred to Muslims talking about other Muslims. Years later, mid-century, Iran used it to describe women not wanting to wear hijabs.
Around 1991 or 1997, the term’s modern usage and popularity in English came from the Runnymede Trust, a British race-equality think tank, through its landmark report Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All. British sociologist Chris Allen, a leading researcher, was concerned about racism against Islamists and was likely among the first to use it. It was the beginning of the blind acceptance of all Islam and the ignoring of radical Islam.
British sociologists have extensively researched Islamophobia, leading to several conclusions that have reshaped public policy and academic understanding. Prominent figures like Tariq Modood, Nasar Meer, and research bodies like the Runnymede Trust concluded that Islamophobia is a profound, systemic issue in modern Britain.
And so it began: the misery of multiculturalism international and the advent of shutting down speech people didn’t like. The term Islamophobia was then used to silence and manipulate citizens. The word became a cudgel.