President Trump slammed partisan Justice Sonya Sotomayor, who only votes left, during a press conference in India on Tuesday as he was set to wrap up his trip. He called for Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor to recuse themselves in matters related to him due to their bias. These things always take place when the President has had a successful trip overseas. It’s another manufactured crisis by Democrats.
He first addressed a question from Fox News about his overnight Twitter comments saying two Supreme Court justices — Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg — should recuse themselves from cases surrounding his presidency. He then singled out Sotomayor for particular criticism.
“I just thought it was so inappropriate, such a terrible statement for a Supreme Court justice,” he said. “She’s trying to shame people with perhaps a different view into voting her way, and that’s so inappropriate.”
That is what Sotomayor did do in fact.
Sotomayor issued a scathing dissent Friday after a ruling in the case of Wolf v. Cook County, a case allowing the administration to expand situations where the government can deny visas to non-citizens [welfare takers].
“It is hard to say what is more troubling,” Sotomayor wrote, “that the Government would seek this extraordinary relief seemingly as a matter of course, or that the Court would grant it.”
The Obama-appointed Justice Sotomayor was a lawyer for LaRaza and supports open borders policies.
President Trump continued, “I just don’t know how they can not recuse themselves from anything having to do with Trump or Trump-related. The right thing to do is that.”
He continued: “What Justice Sotomayor said yesterday was really highly inappropriate and everybody agrees to that. Virtually everybody. I’ve seen papers on it people cannot believe that she said it.”
Many did in fact criticize Justice Sotomayor.
Watch:
Sotomayor is clearly corrupting the court by ripping into Justices with whom she disagrees.
NASTY BARB — A WEALTH TEST
She and her critics see it as a “wealth test” for legal immigrants.
“Today’s decision follows a now-familiar pattern,” Sotomayor began. “The Government seeks emergency relief from this Court, asking it to grant a stay where two lower courts have not. The Government insists—even though review in a court of appeals is imminent—that it will suffer irreparable harm if this Court does not grant a stay. And the Court yields.”
She wanted to drag the decision out, but, in fact, this is how it was done in the past. The U.S. didn’t take people who were coming in for welfare and who weren’t self-sufficient.
“This Court is partly to blame for the breakdown in the appellate process,” Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, wrote. “That is because the Court—in this case, the New York cases, and many others—has been all too quick to grant the Government’s ‘reflexiv[e]’ requests. But make no mistake: Such a shift in the Court’s own behavior comes at a cost.”
“I fear that this disparity in treatment erodes the fair and balanced decisionmaking process that this Court must strive to protect,” Sotomayor concluded.
In accusing the originalist justices of bias, she has proven she is completely biased as is Justice Ginsburg.
President Trump tweeted, “Sotomayor accuses GOP appointed Justices of being biased in favor of Trump.” @IngrahamAngle @FoxNews This is a terrible thing to say. Trying to “shame” some into voting her way? She never criticized Justice Ginsberg when she called me a “faker”. Both should recuse themselves…
…on all Trump, or Trump related, matters! While “elections have consequences”, I only ask for fairness, especially when it comes to decisions made by the United States Supreme Court!”
The President referenced @Laura Ingraham who weighed in on the matter. She is a lawyer who clerked with Justice Thomas. Media Matters and other leftists are going absolutely wild against her and the President.
Here is what she said [and we think she makes a great point]:
Ms. Ingraham also corrected Sotomayor’s errors. “Judge Sotomayor says ‘eminent’ when she means ‘imminent,’ ‘providence’ instead of ‘province,’ ‘story of knowledge’ instead of ‘store of knowledge,’…
“Judge Sotomayor says ‘eminent’ when she means ‘imminent,’ ‘providence’ instead of ‘province,’ ‘story of knowledge’ instead of ‘store of knowledge,’ and so on” Ed Whelan reminded us years ago. https://t.co/FcatdwvM5n
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) February 24, 2020
THE LEFTISTS ARE OUT IN FORCE AND SOTOMAYOR AND GINSBURG ARE TRENDING
They were laying in wait for the President to respond.
In case you missed it: Sonia Sotomayor called out the Supreme Court majority for its Trump bias. This is highly unusual for a SCOTUS justice. https://t.co/FbDJHuWBmA
— Mother Jones (@MotherJones) February 25, 2020
Trump now asking Sotomayor and RBG to recuse themselves from Trump related Supreme Court cases which is amazing and will be forgotten by tonight’s debate. The wife of Clarence Thomas meanwhile is helping Trump’s “purge.” This all happens in authoritarian regimes.
— Wajahat Ali (@WajahatAli) February 25, 2020
Trump targets Sotomayor, Ginsburg in tweets, seeks their recusal from all ‘Trump related’ cases https://t.co/0KBGTj2lvD
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) February 25, 2020
Justice Sotomayor’s dissent is a call to action, and now Trump is attacking her for speaking the truth.
Progressives planning protest at the Supreme Court next week to speak out against the Court’s pro-Trump bias.
Details to follow.
— Brian Fallon (@brianefallon) February 25, 2020
Of course Trump’s misogynist, racist ass wouldn’t want women holding him accountable. Especially a Latina BOSS legend and liberator like Sotomayor.
— Kendrick Sampson (@kendrick38) February 25, 2020
Sotomayor should take advantage of some of those free English class, she can’t even make a clear dissent without also making some rookie errors. I guess this must be the new common core method…
What’s the problem here, “judge”? Losing your deep state grip on We the People?
When did Sotomayor ever vote against the Democrat agenda? We’ll wait. Take your time.
Sotomayor does not deserve to be on the Supreme Court. She makes partisan complaints that didn’t bother her when the Obama administration was doing the exact same thing. Making decisions based on her emotions rather than the rule of law is unacceptable in her position.. She needs to go.
Going public like that is an ethical issue, especially by a SC Justice. Revealing her own bias so blatantly only compounds her problems. “Wise Latina”? smh When “Feelz” rule your thinking processes and resultant actions, recusing yourself from the bench is the prudent course of action.
Criticizing fellow Justices should be done to their faces around the conference table in chambers.
Instead, the “Wise Latin” chose to make her beefs a public airing of dirty laundry.
Sonia proves herself little more than a Mexican Laundress.
So We can move into Her house and she will support us???
To vote in Mexico every citizen has to have a tamper-proof photo ID card
with a thumbprint and an embossed hologram.
All citizens are required to personally enroll and show proof of birth or citizenship.
How Mexico Treats ‘Undesirable’ Foreigners
Mexico fiercely maintains laws against illegal border crossings; “verification visits” to enforce visa conditions; requirements that foreigners produce proof of legal status on demand; and enforcement and cooperation between and among immigration officials and law-enforcement authorities at all levels in Mexico. Native-born Mexicans are also empowered to make citizens’ arrests of illegal aliens and turn them in to authorities.
Mexico’s National Catalogue of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizen’s identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest at any time. And for those seeking permanent residency or naturalization, Mexico requires that they must not be economic burdens on society and must have clean criminal histories. Those seeking to obtain Mexican citizenship must show a birth certificate, provide a bank statement proving economic independence, pass an exam, and prove they can provide their own health care.
Applicants are assessed based on a point system using factors such as level of education, employment experience, and scientific and technological knowledge. Property acquisition and ownership by foreigners is still severely restricted. Mexican corporations are banned from hiring illegal aliens.
If any Democrats brought any ILLEGALS into that speech they were HARBORING a FUGITIVE ….. a FELONY ……. remove them from office.
http://humanevents.com/2006/05/08/mexicos-immigration-law-lets-try-it-here-at-home/
Mexico’s Immigration Law: Let’s Try It Here at Home Monday May 8, 2006 12:00 AM
Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.
That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve
our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
in the country legally;
have the means to sustain themselves economically;
not destined to be burdens on society;
of economic and social benefit to society;
of good character and have no criminal records; and
contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that:
immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens — and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or
Sotomayor is an ENEMY AGENT.
Ingraham is easy on the eyes and a fighter and I miss her on local Das Radio. The wise Latina has spoken and you rubes better bow down.
This is another reason that the comrades loathe Trump, he is undoing all the damage to the judicial branch of government caused by Hussein Hopenchange.
Sotomayor is and always was an affirmative action hire.
Laura Ingraham lays it out.Not only is Sotomayor incompetent but her clerks share the same incompetency.
sotomayor has no problem with implementation of the cloward-piven strategy, and sees hordes of unskilled and uneducated on welfare as the best way to bankrupt our nation and bring about “benevolent communism”.
Comments are closed.