Rep. Lisa McClain, a Republican from Michigan, had the best line of questioning at today’s hearing. Until she asked the right questions, no one knew that Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle had many of the answers. She just won’t tell Congress or the American people.
Cheatle was playing with semantics.
Watch:
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
After more thought on this attempted assassination.
Considering the massive spy apparatus used to spy on US citizens; how could the CIA, NSA, SS, HLS, FBI not known their would be an attempt on a former POTUS and candidate. Don’t tell anyone… shooo
Set up!
This interview of Cheatle proves why she was put in the SS Director position; Cheatle is excellent at applying the “Potomac Two Step”. Was she trained by AG Loretta Lynch? I’d bet the Deep State has a confidential training class for these liars.
Common sense: it was a planned hit, the government is in on it-planned it-saw it thru.
USSS Director is in on it- she was hired as insurance and is stonewalling as part of her “preparation”.
Her “preparation” was these pat answers that don’t answer anything but take up time – time to get rid of evidence.
The big “computer crash” is part of this- to delete more evidence and cover the trails of the guilty.
Wake up people!!
Cheatle echoes same ole DC Dictator Deep State Bull Shit. IF Trump is murdered or cheated again out of the election; the only answer then is 25,000,000 patriots march on DC with pitch forks.
I watched the whole 5 hours, at some point Cheatle finally admits she knows how many casings were found near Crooks, but she says she cannot tell us how many.
Try as I might, I cannot find any reason for hiding the number of casing other than; that number is lower than the number of shots recorded on audio tracks.
9 shots were fired, supposedly 8 by Crooks and one by the sniper.
If there was 8 casing by Crooks why would Cheatle be refusing to tell us ?
obviously there are LESS than 8
which means someone else was shooting
the FBI and the USSS will have to fabricate some story to explain that.
That is why they want 60 days.
They will say 3 of the casings rolled down the sloped roof, fell in the grass and when the lawn was mowed the casings were destroyed or some stupid story like that.
It is obvious the 3 first shots were by the professional assassin that Cheatle knew was there.
It is obvious that her refusing to tell us who was in charge means SHE was in charge, I do not mean she was there on site, I mean she prior to the event had gave the order to stand down and not shoot until Crooks began shooting.
Why else is she refusing to give the most basic information ???
It was an assassination all orchestrated by the democrat deep state, and Cheatle was in charge of making sure that event would be set up in way to make sure the professional shooter would be able to shoot Trump, and no one would stop Crooks as they needed him as the Patsy and the scape goat.
The plan and the order for the hit may have come from higher, Obama, Hillary, Garland, Mayorkas or even Joe and Jill Biden, but Cheatle was in charge of making sure it would work.
It was not incompetence, the more we learn about it the less incompetence can explain it.
It was intent, 100% intent.
Cheatle admits she knows but refuses to say how many bullet casings found on roof = because we’d find out there was a second shooter.
The only reason why she would not tell us the number of casings found near Crooks is that it would confirm that he did not fire 8 of the 9 shots ( the last one being by the counter sniper )
The audio analysis clearly indicates the first 3 shots are very different than the following 5, then there is one last shot also different from all others
Most people are saying the first 3 are the real assassin, the 5 others are Crooks shooting at the crowd, the last is the counter sniper shooting Crooks.
if there are only 5 casings by Crooks then Cheatle cannot tell us as it would confirm there was two people shooting at Trump
she and her team of liars will find a way to fabricate some story to hide the truth
Democrats used that hearing to say “AR 15” about 50 times and make the whole thing about banning AR 15s
but that is not all
Raskin said something that has to be a lie
he did not say Crooks was identified within a few hours trough DNA as we have been told
he said Crooks was identified in 30 minutes from the serial number on the AR 15
I think he is lying but said that because – as he said himself – some people disagree with the idea of serial numbers on firearms associated with the owner.
He was selling an idea – a democrat anti-gun idea – by using a lie… is what it looked like.
Wasn’t AOC saying AR “16” instead 15? There is a distinctive difference between those. If she was really saying 16 instead of 15 she obviously doesn’t know the difference nor the law.
The 16 is M-16 “not” AR-16