SCOTUS rules in the anything goes election fraud cases

2
909

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected the last of former President Donald Trumpโ€™s election challenges.

The court turned away the case in which Trump questioned Wisconsin election procedures in an unsigned order.

Itโ€™s over, but by SCOTUS ignoring all of these cases, they are condoning the last minute election rule changes, even those that appear unconstitutional. Basically, anything goes.

When the court pushed off consideration of all election litigation until after Bidenโ€™s inauguration, it signaled that it would not seriously consider Trumpโ€™s after-the-fact efforts to investigate election integrity, seen by many as an attempt to overturn the election without justification.

However, Justice Clarence Thomas scolded his colleagues in a dissent he wrote for another case suggesting that the court should hear these cases to help protect the country from future issues regarding elections.

Thomas wrote, โ€œThese cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority non-legislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.โ€

Reporter Zoe Tillman tweeted Monday, โ€œSCOTUS this a.m. continued to officially close the loop and reject Trump et al.โ€™s post-election legal challenges, denying cert in Trumpโ€™s Wisconsin case and Lin Woodโ€™s Georgia case.โ€


Subscribe to the Daily Newsletter

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments