Facebook Pinterest X Youtube
Facebook Pinterest X Youtube
Home Home Inaction by the Police Chief Led to Charlie Kirk’s Death

Inaction by the Police Chief Led to Charlie Kirk’s Death

By
M Dowling
-
11
2825

Partial Reprint from November 18

Charlie Kirk’s security guards tried to save his life, giving him first aid. However, the head of his security, a former police officer, Brian Harpole, said the “wounds were incompatible with life”. Sadly, Police Chief Long told Mr. Harpole on the Monday before Charlie was killed that he would safeguard the roof. Charlie’s head of security had asked due to his expressed concerns about the danger. Long never did what he promised to do.

“We have some correspondence with the chief of the school uh on that day, on Monday, before Charlie was killed and why this hadn’t come out and why he won’t stand up like a man and admit this, I don’t know, but he’s watching a bunch of men lose their careers and he’s okay with it,” Harpole told Ryan. “On Monday before, this correspondence went to Chief Long. ‘Hello, Chief Long. We received this message today from the student group. ‘There is a student roof access pretty close to where CK will be set up at the Utah Valley. (The Sorenson Center has a couple of staircases that go up to walkways on the roofs.)’”

“He comes back and the so, for edification, the Sorenson Center was the building in front of the Losee Center and so, he comes back he says you want uh access to the roof and came back and said I was told students have access above us,” Harpole continued. “If this is true it would be nice to either have it controlled access or allow one of my guys to be there as well if possible. He comes back and his last correspondence was, ‘I got you covered.’ What else am I to do when a command level person from an accredited police department says, ‘I’ve got this area.’?”

“That was the chief of police for the UVU Police Department. We’ve called him. He’s never called us back,” Harpole added as Shawn Ryan responded by saying “Holy shit.”

Go to 55:36:

This next clip includes the message exchanged between Charlie Kirk’s head of security and the UVU chief of police regarding the rooftop.

The Efforts Made

Candace Owens, who wasn’t at the event, claimed no one gave him first aid.

The head of Charlie Kirk’s security explains in this clip the aid he had given, and how they raced, sometimes up to 100 mph, to the hospital with the dying Charlie Kirk. Harpole mentions the blood everywhere.

In this clip, he explained the reported hand signals: there were none.

In this clip, Brian Harpole explains that he has no ties to Israel. They are Americans.

 

Previous articleSenate Lawsuit Law Was Voted Down in the House Unanimously
Next articleThe Two Deadliest Ideologies on Earth

11 COMMENTS

  1. These articles fall somewhere between pathetic and absolute lying rubbish. Every single aspect of the official narrative is provably false, and easily provably false at that. I do not know a single person who believes the official story (thank God), but the unanaminous support from every media outlet (even the alternative ‘conservative’ outlets) is a good indicater of how far down the rabbit hole we have already slipped.
    Every gun enthusiast knows it’s b.s.
    Every nurse knows the doctor’s statements about Charlie being “like the man of steel” are b.s.
    His tissue stopping a 30-06 is b.s.
    And unless the man on the roof had an amazing incredible invisible rubber rifle in his pants that entire piece of the story is b.s.
    Every HONEST law enforcement officer on planet earth knows the entire narrative is b.s.
    There is so much more that is obviously b.s.

    So who benefits from covering up for the real killer?
    Who had a motive to kill Charlie?
    Why would all the feds and the local cops lie?
    Who has the power to arrange such a thing?
    Who wanted Charlie to shut up?
    Who was complaining about Charlie?
    Who was the first person to report that Charlie was dead, and how did he know?
    Who immediately claimed their innocence?

    The questions people have raised are legitimate, and defaming people for raising them is the surest proof of complicity.
    The trans crowd has spiritual and mental issues to be sure, but in this case they are being used as a convienent scapegoat. They had no use for Charlie but they didn’t do this.
    From the money Charlie turned down, to the foriegners shadowing Erika, to confiscating phones and paving over the crime scene, it all points to one inescapable conclusion.
    Charlie’s murder was a public execution meant to send a message to those who would exercise their first ammendment rights. Some subjects are not to be spoken of.

  3. We already know Harpole is a LIAR, because he had no blood on him.

    We already know Harpole had primary responsibility for security.

    We already know there was security facing forward directly at that roof.

    This site has a big problem being unable to be straight on assassination attempts.

    Look at the video of the man running on the roof. That video should include the firing of the rifle, if there was a rifle. Why is the part of the shooting cut out? There has been no video evidence the man had a rifle, not when arriving or leaving. Notice when the man runs there is a shadow on the gray part of the roof, but not on the white part of the roof.

    • As Owens exposed, a 30-06 bullet did not kill Kirk. She discredited the entire story from the corrupt establishment, while this site attacks her. This site also got Butler wrong, claiming Crooks fired 8 shots, when there are 2 different sets of acoustic signatures. Facts matter.

  5. (1) I’ve shot guns all my life and I don’t believe the shooter was going for a neck shot. There are several reasons that could have influenced the bullet’s impact point vs. where he was aiming.
    (2) There is nothing you can do for a victim with a shot like this. You can’t put a tourniquet on the neck and same applies if you put enough pressure on the neck it will stop the blood flow to the brain. Perhaps only if you are shot in the hospital parking lot with a surgery room full of doctors and a cart full of typed match blood you might approach 50/50 odds.
    (3) Charlie Kirk wasn’t on my radar, sure I’ve seen little clips of him going toe to toe against kids at college campuses but after his death I’ve watch several of his rallies (TAMU Part I & II are good) and the day Donald Trump was elected was the day Charle Kirk’s profile was elevated to the point where he should have only had indoor rallies with TSA type security at the doors. Whoever was in charge of Charle Kirk’s security should be tried for involuntary manslaughter. It was only a mater of time before someone pushed a pistol through the crowd and not only shot Charle Kirk but hit a few innocent bystanders.
    (4) Charlie Kirk’s shoes will never be filled. The videos I’ve watch are not racist, they are the hard truth that you don’t want to hear but nothing I’ve seen is racist or “hate speech.”

  6. They learned nothing from the Trump assassination attempt in Butler? Hard to believe unless there was “willful ignorance” afoot.

Comments are closed.

© 2011 www.independentsentinel.com. All Rights Reserved.