It seems that only one juror is holding out on a decision in the Lindsey Clancy trial. Clancy’s lawyer appears eager to see the juror replaced, which makes one wonder if it is because he has inside information that 11 jurors will give Clancy a satisfactory verdict. The lawyer, Kevin Reddington, wants the juror replaced by an alternate because the juror is allegedly not following the law.
The judge will conduct an investigation as tensions flare.
People don’t like the sound of that and ask, Since when are jurors not allowed to have differing opinions? Of course, we don’t know what law she allegedly isn’t following.
All of this suggests she is the only juror who would have found Lindsey Clancy guilty.
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer says juror who refuses to follow the rule of law has been identified and there will be an inquiry pic.twitter.com/DJkJZpAhKf
— New York Post (@nypost) September 3, 2026
People believe it isn’t that Lindsey Clancy isn’t following the law; the reason is she is the only one who would find her guilty. I certainly hope tha isn’t true. Lindsey Clancy planned and carried out the murder of her three children as a psychopath or clinical narcissist would. Is she accurately diagnosed? One thing that struck me is how angry she looked when her husband testified.
This is wild
NBC reporter Laura Jarrett seems to agree that the one juror who’s holding up the verdict and will likely be the only one to find Lindsay Clancy guilty should be removed
“Why wouldn't the judge just remove that one juror — if there is any suggestion at all that… pic.twitter.com/PP2AI6NFvn
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) September 3, 2026