The Panama Canal Is a Problem Because China Is Taking It Over

4
959

The main reason Donald Trump is concerned about the Panama Canal goes well beyond the outrageous fees they charge American military and companies. The US built the canal at great cost and at a great loss of American lives. The Canal is critical to national security. China, our most dangerous enemy, indirectly controls the canal.

Donald Trump wants to take it back from China, not Panama. Allegedly, China doesn’t control the canal, but a Hong Kong company does. However, China controls every company in Hong Kong.

China is buying all the land around the channel. Once the operation is complete, China, not Panama authorities, will control the channel. That is unacceptable.

Compared to other Central American countries Panama has a substantial population of Chinese origin numbering some 150,000, making it the largest Chinese community in the region.

The US lease ran out.  However, some reports say that the treaty turning the canal over to Panama contains a clause that says the United States can take the canal back if the United States decides it isn’t being operated properly. That is being rebutted, but it is true that it isn’t being run properly.

Sky News reports the US has no legal means to reclaim the canal. The only way it could get the waterway back is to invade Panama. A treaty was signed in 1977 to hand over the canal to Panama on December 31, 1999, after which the treaty expired, and Panama owned the waterway, which the Panama Canal Authority runs.

Then-President Jimmy Carter gave the Canal away to Panama and since then, it has been extremely poorly managed. It needs expansion.It’s barely functioning.


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jack johnson
jack johnson
4 months ago

The US did retain the ‘ultimate’ rights to the canal, this is a common misconception.
If the canal is in danger or a danger to the US, we retain the right to intervene.
My guess is this is the avenue Trump is pursuing

Staff
Admin
4 months ago
Reply to  jack johnson

I thought subsequent treaties canceled that? Do you have more information?

Anonymous
Anonymous
4 months ago

Like trump said, they were given the canal under the circumstances and condition that they were to manage it for us and for themselves. If they’re not managing it correctly and are not keeping their end of the agreement, then yep, take it back.

Either way you look at it the line has been drawn. All trump said was keep your end of the agreement or we will take the necessary measures. We’ll see about that.

Dr. Van Nostrand
Dr. Van Nostrand
4 months ago

Take it back. That jackass Carter had no right giving it away.