The massive port workers’ strike that has shut down all the major dockyards on the Eastern seaboard of the U.S. and the Gulf Coast is highlighting a fear held by many workers: Eventually, we will be replaced by machines.
The International Longshoremen’s Association, which represents the approximately 45,000 dock workers who walked off the job Tuesday, is trying to fight back.
The union demands a total ban on automating gates, cranes, and container-moving trucks in its ports. They also want big pay raises. They only make about $28 an hour. Many are in states where it is very expensive to live. But it’s unclear whether they’ll be able to stave off a trend that has seeped into virtually every workspace.
The growth of automation and technological advances has created tension between workers and management since the Industrial Revolution when machines first began to manufacture goods that had previously been made by hand. With the growing use of artificial intelligence, the group of jobs workers perceive as threatened with disruption is ever-widening.
Other ports are far more efficient because they use advanced automation. However, if automation goes through as planned, these workers will mostly be out of work.
Can they stop it? Should they? A strike lasting more than two weeks will probably create an economic crisis.
THE CORE PROBLEM
Port automation is going quickly in Asia and Europe, and they aren’t using American workers or equipment. Significantly, they don’t allow foreigners to take over their ports. It’s a matter of national security.
In the US, politicians sold us out to foreign and international companies. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Europe, Venezuela, Singapore, and, of course, China own our ports. None of these people, including Europeans, should own them, but they do.
Critics of the Dubai Ports World deal have suggested that U.S. companies should run U.S. ports. Despite that, Adam Davidson wrote at NPR in 2006 that most port terminals are leased and run by foreign companies, and that’s unlikely to change.
The government of Singapore owns most of the companies that operate terminals in Los Angeles and elsewhere. Two Chinese companies, both with close ties to the Chinese government, manage terminals in New York, Long Beach, and elsewhere. The government of Venezuela owns all or part of marine terminal management at ports in Pennsylvania and Maine.
CMA CGM bought two container terminals at the Port of New York and New Jersey. CM CGM is owned by a French-Lebanese company.
They hire people for low pay.
Also, foreigners, Chinese in particular, can shut down our ports.
Foreigners will control automation. At the same time, we need to be competitive, but at what cost? We sold out American workers.
Only foreigners and foreign equipment will run our ports if the union loses. It won’t take long, either.
They also lost money during COVID and inflation is killing them, too.
Union president Harold Daggett’s job is to represent Longshoremen, and he does so to the best of his ability. Biden-Harris have done far more damage. It’s not clear if the union can hold this back at this point. America should buy back those ports instead of wasting money on pie-in-the-sky or computer-generated crises that probably don’t exist as crises.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
This article didn’t age well. The union just intentionally gave a gift to commie-la by delaying the strike until Jan 15th. FUCK’EM
I saw that. It didn’t even last the day. At least our economy won’t crash and people can buy toilet paper.
Is it ironic that this union has endorsed the kamala waltz ticket, and that this administration has endorsed this union leader. And that the biden administration is supposedly behind footing the bill to replace all the cranes with brand new robotic cranes. And that the timing of the strike is being timed with the elections, and in an economy that is faltering, and in very turbulent times abroad. Things are not happening as they appear on the surface. It is happening now as a diversionary tactic. Just like being invaded with illegal immigrants, it is all happening to cause instability. Prove me wrong.
Glenn Beck asks, why is this happening right before the election?!
https://www.glennbeck.com/radio/port-worker-strike-affect-you
After researching all the facts. It is clear that they’re going to eventually lose out on their current jobs to robotics. Because there’s no way to match the proficiency and speed of the robotics and for the US to remain competitive in the shipping business.
But there’s a silver lining in it for them if they play their cards right. A substantial severance package.
What must be watched closely is that the US and only US companies operates and owns all interests in US ports, and that foreign interests are removed and prohibited from owning any share in US ports. Like they do today.
Glad someone finally pointed out why what the ILA is doing is vital to their union members: Automation that turns more Americans into serfs and foreign dominance over our ports. The New York Post, Fox News, and other ShitCon media talking heads are trying to turn Americans against the ILA with Chamber of Commerce and Koch Brother talking points. Meanwhile, the ILA is doing more to prove how essential America First jobs are and why economic independence is so vital than any single Republican in Congress unwilling to shut down the government because they’re afraid of the kompromat held by domestic or foreign intelligence services. The Republicans and Democrats are cowards that will fund Ukraine and Israel for money laundering purposes, but leave Americans to die in North Carolina. I applaud the ILA for protecting their America First jobs.
I remember the big uproar during the Bush administration over foreign ownership. As usual promises were made but never materialized.