Based on National Security and the Alien Enemies Act, the Trump administration refused to answer Judge Boasberg’s questions involving national security. Boasberg is the judge who demanded the president turn around the planes with dangerous criminals aboard.
“The Government maintains that there is no justification to order the provision of additional information and that doing so would be inappropriate,” the Justice Department said in a court filing responding to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s ruling that it provides him with more information about the deportation flights.
The department argued that the details Boasberg requested would “disclose sensitive information bearing on national security and foreign relations.”
Boasberg demanded answers by noon today.
Boasberg Is Considering Consequences
On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg gave the government another day to respond. But his latest order suggests he isn’t pleased.
Following a hearing Monday at which the government didn’t want to answer Boasberg’s questions, the judge issued an order requiring officials to submit a sealed declaration answering outstanding questions about Saturday’s deportations.
The government also said it’s evaluating whether to invoke the state secrets privilege regarding information sought by the judge.
In his latest order on Wednesday, Boasberg wrote that he wasn’t seeking information for a “fishing expedition” but rather “to determine if the Government deliberately flouted” his orders and “if so, what the consequences should be.”
Consequences?
Attorney General Pam Bondi told Judge Boasberg that the deportation flights would continue.
The ACLU filed the lawsuit against the deportations, and Clinton attorney Marc Elias is involved. The attacks on the administration are incestuous.
Boasberg thinks he is the president. Democrats are trying to start a constitutional crisis and use it against Donald Trump for the next four years. They’re building a contempt trap.
A showdown is coming.
The House should Immediately remove Goofy Boasberg from his position. Do it now!
Did you know Ben and Jerry’s ice cream contains glycerine? That’s anti-freeze. Has this crazy judge been eating this sh*t. Check it out: https://www.fooducate.com/product/Ben-Jerry-s-Ice-Cream-Vanilla-Swiss-Almond/9A4882E4-E111-11DF-A102-FEFD45A4D471
If president Trump trespassed the law, B’berg should bring charges.
What consequences? This district judge has no way of enforcing his activist decisions. Who is he going to declare in contempt of his contemptuous court? The Trump administration? The President? Remember when Holder was held in contempt of congress? What happened to him? Nothing.
(1) Start a Go Fund Me account (I’m good for $100)….we’ll raise millions.
(2) Go knock on the doors of Judge Boasberg neighbors and say “name your price” for your house
(3) Fill each house with the Venezuelan gang members
(4) Check back in a month to see how Judge Boasberg enjoys living with his rulings.
Apparently, Judge Boasberg believes he’s a king that can command obedience from his subjects. When in truth, he’s just a little pissant leftist in a Black robe who has no power what so ever. Consequences? What consequences can he impose on a President of the United States? Contempt of Court? Arrest? Like that will ever happen, especially when the entire DOJ is under the control of the President. This is another example of exactly how out of touch, disfunctional, and corrupt America’s judicial system actually is.
THE FREAKIN JUDGE HAS NO STANDING WHATSOEVER AND ALSO THE SO CALLED ACLU AND HILLARY’S LAWYER HAVE NO STANDING. THEN JUDGE THREATENS CONTEMPT, WELL BRING IT ON BITCH. THE CORRUPT BASTARD SHOULD BE RE-ASSIGNED TO SOME DESK JOB SOMEWHERE AS A FILE CLERK. THE ONLY CONTEMPT “WE THE PEOPLE” SEE IS THE CONTEMPT FOR OUR CONSTITUTION BY THE JUDGES AND DEMOCRATS.
Musk and Trump need to immediately cut off every penny of taxpayer money destined for the ACLU or any of their affiliates. These scumbags have made it clear they would rather defend “ILLEGAL” immigrants invading this country, than defend the Constitution that they swore to uphold. I’d help pay to have them all deported as well and their citizenship revoked!!
A “contempt trap?” According to the SCOTUS, the president cannot be held criminally liable for official actions taken while in office. I’d say deporting criminals is an official action, no?
And this pizzant judge is going to hold the United States government “accountable” how, exactly? By siccing the the executive department against them? Oh, wait! Like Andrew Jackson said “(the judge) has made his ruling, now let him enforce it.”
I hope people are keeping track of the leftist scumbag activist in the Judicial system…. if they’re able to collapse the system, they need to be held accountable.
He’s going to send in a bunch of Roscoe P. Coltranes to square off with the US military? This ought to be fun to watch as the bald headed monster and his cronies get pounded into the dirt.
consequences? screw him.
Doge scotus, see if they’re spending our tax dollars wisely, see if the there are too many clerks for each justice, see if they’re the right sex or trans, see if the A/C is set too low, see if security is too tight to allow the public truly see how the sausage is made.
Luckily, Bondi does not control the deportations, Noem does, or they would be in jeopardy.
This is the acid test for Bondi. She is weak and defensive. Will she continue to tolerate this judge? Why accept any deadlines or threats? She is weakening this administration. The entire momentum of Trump is being stifled by the DOJ. Trump giving in on this would be an incredible blunder. If Bondi wants to be the weak link, let her isolate herself. The answer should have been absolute refusal to turn over the information.
Luckily, Miller, Gabbard, Noem and Patel are likely big voices in pushing against Bondi. Those are 4 strong voices against Bondi. They should beat her up every time there is a discussion on these related issues. Recall that Bondi conceded in court this week that the judge’s rulings are legal when in US territory. Then, she had to eat those words by denying the order for a day. That was a huge reversal.
My hunch is that Noem would refuse to turn over the information to Bondi no matter what Bondi says. Bondi is weak in general, and is becoming weak in the administration. She needs to fade away.
I advocate stopping making appearances in his court.
This Marxist is a DISTRICT JUDGE. I don’t care if he was funded by Soros, as were so many leftist judges and DA’s. HE HAS NO POWER OVER THE POTUS.
Look at his face. You know he’s crazy, right?
fuck the pencil dicked judge
The “Judge’s” zipper is down. obama lover…
Bozo man gettin’ a little big for his britches.
Probably they’re pink silky with ruffles under those robes.
Boasberg wants a fight… Start with an indictment for the judicial ethics laws he’s violating just by claiming this case for himself.
Yes, go on the offensive, but Bondi is not capable of that.
He looks like what he is, and I will say what he is ; a machiavellian psychopath.
Reckless machiavellian psychopath
I wish the president could sign an executive order to eliminate the judicial branch.
Love great humor! If only getting rid of unconstitutional judges could be done simply… I doubt the founders could imagine the hateful anti-constitutional politics of the Democrats, and their refusal to give a needed majority to impeach “their” evil judges. Of course TDS was not known in the 1700’s.
They had theirs methods. Just legislate the order that created these courts and eliminate them by changing their jurisdiction and/or DEFUNDING their courts!!!
The Founders understood that the judiciary – like all branches of government – was made up of people, and people are prone to the temptations of power. Judges, despite their robes and lofty titles, were no exception.
Thomas Jefferson warned that judges, like other officials, could be swayed by ambition, partisanship, and the desire to expand their own authority. He put it bluntly:
“Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privileges of their corps. Their maxim is ‘boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem,’ and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal knowing that, to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time & party its members would become despots.”
Or an Executive order to exterminate the judicial tyrannical judges !!!
Comments are closed.