At Penn, MIT, Harvard, You Can Call for the Genocide of Jews

5
288

Top universities allowed and will continue to allow radical mobs to call for the genocide of Jews. It’s not against their code of conduct.ย 

Harvard President Claudine Gay admits that certain statements are anti-Semitic and even call for the murder of Jews. However, when confronted with these statements on campus during protests and demonstrations, she will not condemn them. It was a shocking display by the president of the most prestigious university in the world.

It didn’t stop there. Two other university professors agreed that it only violates their code of conduct if it is turned into action. According to them, it has to be considered in context.

Rep. Elise Stefanik did an outstanding job of putting them in the hot seat, but it didn’t faze them. Dr. Magill appeared to smirk at times.

TRANSMORPHING ANTI-SEMITISM

Elise Stefanik asked Dr. Sally Kornbluth, MIT President, if โ€œcalling for the genocide of Jews violates MIT’s code of conduct or rules regarding bullying and harassment. Yes or no?”

โ€œIf they’ve targeted at individuals, not making public statements.โ€

Stefanik repeated the statement. โ€œYes or no? Calling for the genocide of Jews does not constitute bullying and harassment?”

Kornbluth said she hasnโ€™t heard calls for the genocide of Jews on campus.

Stefanik asked, โ€œBut youโ€™ve heard calls for Intifada?โ€

โ€œI’ve heard chants which can be anti-Semitic depending on the context when calling for the elimination of the Jewish people.โ€

โ€œSo those would not be according to the MIT’s code of conduct or rules,โ€ Stefanik said.

โ€œThat would be investigated as harassment if pervasive and severe.โ€

Stefanik then turned to Liz Magill, President of the University of Pennsylvania. โ€œDoes calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn’s rules or code of conduct? Yes or no?”

โ€œIf the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment, yes.”

โ€œI am asking, is specifically calling for the genocide of Jews, does that constitute bullying or harassment?”

โ€œIf it is directed and severe or pervasive, it is harassment. So the answer is yes. It is a context-dependent decision, congresswoman.โ€

Stefanik raised her voice. โ€œIt’s a context-dependent decision? That’s your testimony today? she asked in disbelief. Calling for the genocide of Jews is depending upon the context? That is not bullying or harassment? This is the easiest question to answer, yes! Miss Magill. So is it your testimony that you will not answer yes? If it is, yes or no?โ€

Magill mind-numbingly gave the same answer. โ€œIf the speech becomes conduct, it can be harassment, yes.”

Stefanik continued, โ€œConduct, meaning committing the act of genocide, the speech is not harassment? This is unacceptable, Miss Magill. I’m going to give you one more opportunity for the world to see your answer. Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Pennโ€™s code of conduct when it comes to bullying and harassment – yes or no?”

โ€œIt can be harassment.”

โ€œThe answer is yes,โ€ Stefanik said, turning to Harvard’s President Dr. Gay.

โ€œAnd Doctor Gay, โ€œAt Harvard, does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Harvard’s rules of bullying and harassment, yes or no?

It can be, depending on the context.โ€

โ€œWhat’s the context?โ€

โ€œTargeted as an individual… if it’s targeted at Jewish students, Jewish individuals.”

โ€œDo you understand your testimony is dehumanizing them? Do you understand that dehumanization is part of antisemitism? I will ask you one more time: does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Harvard’s rules of bullying and harassment, yes or no?”

Gay said, โ€œAnti-Semitic rhetoric โ€ฆ when it crosses into conduct that amounts to bullying harassment intimidation that is actionable conduct. We do take action.โ€

Stefanik stepped in. โ€œSo the answer is yes, that calling for the genocide of Jews violates Harvard’s code of conduct?โ€

โ€œCorrect. Again, it depends on the context,โ€ Gay claimed.

โ€œIt does not depend on the context. The answer is yes, and this is why you should resign. These are unacceptable answers across the board.โ€

[I have to wonder why lily-livered woke women are getting these jobs. Did they get the jobs because they’re oppressed as women? They’re certainly woke, encouraging radicals.]

[Have you noticed that Democrats have backed off in their support of Jews as they pretend they support them? At the same time, have you noticed there are probably more radical Islamists in the US than Jews? Cynically, those are votes. This Democrat Party must change or be abolished.]

Dr. Gay, like the others, will not directly answer questions and won’t stand against calling for a mass genocide of an entire population. She should not be running a university system.

Gay is incapable of answering a question like a normal human being.

MICHAEL OREN


Subscribe to the Daily Newsletter

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
5 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments