In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder, Wikipedia has completely mischaracterized and demonized him. Charlie Kirk was a traditional family man who believed in God, all things the possessed left hates.
They lie about him, take his words out of context or frame things he believes in as evil.
You don’t hate Wikipedia enough pic.twitter.com/bU87HnC2Vu
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 12, 2025
He was such a good guy:
“#CharlieKirk was genuinely open-minded, genuinely curious. His vibe was, ‘I respect you, so if you take a position I don’t agree with, I want to hear your reasons and be open to you.’ And that was him.” — @EmmaJoNYC on #TheGroupChat pic.twitter.com/Goo1SL7uUV
— 2WAY (@2waytvapp) September 14, 2025
Charlie Kirk was not a racist and I will not sit back and allow people to spread that lie
I gave Charlie Kirk his flowers last year and thanked him for helping 100s of young black people get an invite to the White House back in 2019
He helped pay for most of their flights and… pic.twitter.com/xN3T3wFtiY
— Terrence K. Williams (@w_terrence) September 13, 2025
House Republicans announced on Wednesday, Aug. 27, that they have launched an investigation into Wikipedia, arguing that the internet encyclopedia has organized efforts to “inject bias” into its entries.
Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted. He stated that it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.”
Sanger told UnHerd’s Lockdown TV that he started the “encyclopedia of opinion” in 2001 purely on the basis it would offer true neutrality and offer “multiple points of view” on “hot button issues.”
Now, he insisted, conservative voices are “sternly warned if not kicked out” if they try to add a different take on establishment views — which Sanger deemed “propaganda.”
“You can’t cite Fox News on socio-political issues. It’s just banned now,” he said of the apparent clampdown on respected conservative voices.
The New York Times and other so-called legacy media publications lie about him regularly. Here is one example.
NYT Forced To Issue Correction After Making Egregiously False Claim About Charlie Kirk | Nicole Silverio, Daily Caller News Foundation
The New York Times issued a correction on Thursday after falsely accusing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk of making an antisemitic claim… pic.twitter.com/iztLFBgNMe
— Owen Gregorian (@OwenGregorian) September 14, 2025
Hopefully, people are waking up to the danger.
They (yes, “they”) destroyed this, because one man awakened a sleeping giant. Charlie Kirk single-handedly turned back a tidal wave of communist indoctrination rotting our education system.
He was David slaying Goliath and they murdered him for it.
And you know who “they” are. pic.twitter.com/EZOlnpsNHD
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 13, 2025
I was NEVER a fan of Google….and to me Wi/pedia does not exist. Like the ‘legacy’ media before them, and followers of specific ideologies, they are nothing but ‘garbage’ illiterates…
Wikipedia is now unavoidably racist. I do continue to use their site for much good information, but I regret the dishonesty and do not donate to them. right now they’re asking for $2.98.
I didn’t mean racist. I meant leftist. kind of the same thing. sorry.
I have been banned from editing wicked pedophile by leftist “administrators” MANY TIMES. Just by asking questions in the talk sections. They ONLY allow linking to their “trusted media” which are all FAR LEFT propaganda “press”. Propaganda “press” refuse to do stories on left wing demonic acts, or they throw shade to them. NONE of the far left are called far left, here is an example on Media Matters, “Media Matters for America (MMfA) is a nonprofit left leaning watchdog journalism organization.” NOT FAR LEFT, just left leaning. They are one of the most far left organizations I know of. Let’s look at the SPLC who calls anyone right of Bernie Sanders a Naughtsi. “The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is an American 501C3 legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation.” NOT ANY REFERENCE TO THEIR FAR LEFTISM.
I could go into people like lititia James, no mention of her harboring her supposed criminal cousin. And if you try to add it, you will be banned.
Ah yes, the SPLC ‘hate map’.
We’ve used this invaluable tool many times, as a quick go to guide for whom we would like to support.
Most AI information is powered by Wikipedia in the background. This new tech is also compromised.
‘Training models’. Do not trust AI, you are not being told what it’s really being used for.
“They” is the evil democRAT party.
It’s in every library, school and college.
The enemy within is everywhere.
Wiki is good only to learn some basic things about people, such as where they were born, what schools they went to, what orgs they were in.
Wiki cheaply smears people constantly. Are they getting money under the table from government funded NGOs?
Probably, but they don’t need it. There are millions of Americans who donate to Wikimedia each year during their donation drive, which is occurring right now. Wikimedia has about $250 million endowment currently. All of their “content contributors” are leftists who monitor and maintain the site’s information for free. If you edit a page to include any information that is considered right of center, some moderator will come behind you and remove what you added. It has happened to me.
Comments are closed.