Joe Biden and his handlers illegally expanded the eviction moratorium. They are defying a co-equal branch of government, the Supreme Court of the United States. It’s theft of private property and puts landlords in a terrible situation.
If we allow the executive branch to steal property and ignore SCOTUS, we will never get those rights back. The Supreme Court said it is unconstitutional and told Biden not to do it again, and yet he did, saying he knows it’s illegal but it’s the right thing to do.
So, if I think the right thing to do is to steal my neighbor’s property because he has more than I do, can I do it? Can I ignore paying my taxes — it’s the right thing to do?
From here the tyrannical government will do the same with gun rights, and other civil rights, if they are not stopped.
This is a “farcical”, “impeachable offense”, civil rights attorney Harmeet Dhillon said. The executive branch is trying to take over the power of states and local governments and the Supreme Court. They want to rule by fiat with no consideration for landlords who are also struggling to survive.
This would set a very dangerous precedent. Who is the government to come between a landlord and a renter? They have no rights over private property. We can’t let them assume any.
We can’t let the government take away our rights to determine the drugs that go into our system or whether people have to fulfill the contracts they signed when renting or taking out loans and so on.
I’m not sure why letting anonymous people pour in illegally isn’t also an impeachable offense.
Watch:
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
There’s an interesting novel approach to the eviction mandate, using the Third Amendment, the right to be free from quartering soldiers. It would apply to soldiers who cannot be evicted, and thus brings in the quartering Amendment.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.224305/gov.uscourts.dcd.224305.70.1.pdf
O/T-after that comment I said a prayer saying I love you God and the next desktop rotation was of a beautiful church by a river in Austria!
When I got out of the hospital and was well enough for my first walk I found one of those Chick religious tracts with the title…Back From the Dead.
I said seriously out loud and right then a rare snow lightning and thunderclap erupted.
Know it in your heart, don’t be of little faith.
The immaculate Imam Hussein Hopenchange deleted the rule of law with the historic pen and phone for this time.
He also fortified the nomenklatura apparatchik class who hates your guts (and mine).
I’ve seen the Angel of Death and the Hand of GOD so it doesn’t scare me and don’t you be afraid.
I hope enough people figure out that they are completely on their own and surrounded by hostiles.
Only so many can be reached.
In the beginning it seemed to only apply to Federal Housing, not personal property. Evidently it must be including everyone. I really don’t see How this was even possible, or even legal, yet Republicans must have went along with it. Of course the ‘frosting on the cake’ was “Reimbursements”, which appears to be lacking in sufficient numbers. It’s unlikely they will see recompense with SCOTUS as all too often they side with Government itself. We’ve seen their history of elevating the “rights of Government” over the “Rights” of the people. Seldom does SCOTUS “rule” beyond certain small parts of the Constitution. Instead they will deny cases that aren’t within those small sections. For once I would love to see a case brought ON the words of the Constitution, “We The People”. It’s quite encompassing and all decisions should have to meet that declaration. The most egregious is “standing”, which has absolutely No Constitutional grounds.
SCOTUS don’t have a pair; they are really SCrOTUmS
Actually they are empty little sacks of sagging skin with a limp stick between them that can’t rise to the occasion.