Fiery Debate Between Sandra Smith and Mo Brooks- Worth Watching!

2
221

Rep. Mo Brooks blasted Fox News host Sandra Smith for claiming there was no evidence the 2020 election was fraudulent. He did not let her prevaricate with a one-sided viewpoint. In truth, there really has not been an investigation to determine how widespread the corruption was, but there was corruption. The weakness in our elections has not been fixed and can happen again.

I usually give Fox a pass on this issue because there is that $1 billion+ Dominion lawsuit, however, they don’t have to lie. They should address the law changes pre-election, the credibility of mail-in balloting, and the deep-pocketed leftists interfering in the elections.

There is evidence of fraud, especially in the swing states.

Smith is typical corporate.

Brooks also explained the differences he has with Donald Trump.

Watch:

 


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GuvGeek
GuvGeek
2 years ago

Only a total fool believes there was no fraud in the 2020 Elections.

The Prisoner
The Prisoner
2 years ago

Smith is a yes woman airhead. (She happens to be from my neighborhood, went to a school I went by every day.) There is a lot of monetary reward for following the scripts of the Faux News writers.

Faux News will address nothing about the election steal, not merely the Dominion aspect. There are plenty of undeniable aspects of Dominion abuse, such as, modifying equipment during the election and without supervision, suspicious losses of SW keys to control the units, the ability to access the units on the network, SW features allowing changing votes, and so on.