It’s not the Texas Heartbeat Act that endangers Roe but there is one that could

By
M Dowling
-
2
183

The Heartbeat Act does not destroy Roe v.Wade, but another court case — Dobbs v. Jackson could. The Court has agreed to hear the case.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is a challenge to a 2018 law banning abortion at 15 weeks. The court chose not to take the less controversial off-ramp offered by Mississippi. They want to revisit Roe v. Wade.

[Democrats know that, but they are carrying on about the Texas law to frighten the Justices into voting their way. It’s their customary tactic.]

Watch:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Zigmont
Zigmont
4 years ago

What ever happened to birth control meds ? geez if you don’t want a child take something to prevent getting pregnant, another option for women is keep your feet in a 5 gallon bucket if you don’t want to be knocked up!!

0
GuvGeek
GuvGeek
4 years ago

I would be happy if the Supreme Court ruled that any abortion after viability (26 weeks) was illegal. I would be ecstatic if the father had a say in the issue. Both the Mother and Father should be in agreement with an Abortion. I would go future in that if married, if a woman elects to get an abortion without… Read more »

0
wpdiscuz   wpDiscuz