Home Home Mark Cuban Is America First; First We Heard That Was Yesterday

Mark Cuban Is America First; First We Heard That Was Yesterday

18
594

Mark Cuban is hedging his bets and now says he would deign to work for Donald Trump if he wins the election. He’s even stealing the America First slogan while supporting two Marxists for the highest positions in the nation.

He sure can backpedal. Maybe he thinks Trump will punish him, but he’s just not that important.

Democrats are in panic mode. Even with cheating, they can lose. People are finally seeing through the sound bites, and DJT is a racist, misogynist liar garbage. They scream democracy and install an unpopular candidate who won no votes.

The wheels are coming off as Kamala talks. Even the media’s lies and hysteria over every word Trump utters aren’t working as well as in the past.

The Hill reports that Harris aides, allies, and insiders are growing increasingly comfortable with declaring that the Democrat’s campaign has gone badly off-track in the final weeks leading up to the election. Those close to the veep cite tight battleground polls in places like Nevada and Michigan, states which should be reliably blue for a progressive female candidate of color and are now anything but. Even slim leads in the polls can’t be trusted, some say, pointing to margins of error that essentially indicate many of the seven swing states in play could tip either way.

Hopefully, Donald Trump will lose this egotistical guy’s phone number. When he wasn’t making excuses for Biden and Harris, he was insulting Trump. Go away, Mark.

Previous articleConfirmed: North Korean Soldiers Are In Russia
Next articleCBS Goes Off the Rails for Ta-Nehisi Coates

18 COMMENTS

  1. How can he say Harris is the better casndidate for this country? I mean really. I guess billionaires are just plain dumb politically as they are bereft of common sense.

  2. Cuban would be a detriment, he believes in the woke garbage agenda which is destroying the country. He doesn’t bring a single thing to the table, but I would like to be proven wrong. I think he is way past redemption.

  3. I am willing to wade thru everything on the internet and decide for myself what I choose to believe. Once someone or some corporation starts deciding what is true, then Nothing is true

    • Believing stuff on the internet has it’s own perils. Did you know that Google will not show results for sites that are classified as fake news by Wikipedia? There are sites listed that have genuine news but are excluded because of the say so of some Wikipedia employee who I highly doubt is an expert on the subject matter being discussed.

  4. I think we are all ready for a new class of journalist. I am old enough to remember when the media was independent and journalists reported objectively.

    I hope for the day when spin and propaganda in the press are things of the past.

    • I’m 75 now, I look back, knowing what I know now, I don’t remember media ever being honest. Grant administration, the lies about Grant were magnanimous. Media lied 1917 helping Wilson get USA into Europes war, now called WW1. November 3,1948 the Chicago Tribune reported Dewey had won. Next morning Truman won. Was the fix in?

      Media lied about Korean War over before MacArthur was fired. Operation Mockingbird created by CIA for purpose of lying to public. Media lied about Kennedy assassination. Walter Cronkite (Mar 1968) lied about Vietnam Tet offensive. Etc etc. etc.

      Definitely agree, would be nice to be able to rely that media is honestly objective instead of pushing government or big pharma narrative.

      BTW, left out a lot of examples and details.

      • Or when they broke the story about Watergate. Or when the Iranians took the Americans Hostage. Or when the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor. Or when the earthquake took out San Francisco. Or when the Twin Towers fell. Or when the Hindenburg went down in flames. Yep all fake. Not!

        It used to be most of the reporting was objective. Now most reporting are shades of gray or outright BS. There is always going to be some bone head looking for a headline or the scoop of the century even if they get it wrong. That’s what retractions are for.

        I think Journalists should be bound by oath, required to report the facts objectively by law and held legally accountable. Then maybe we will have real reporting and less crap.

        • There’s a book out now about Nixon (didn’t read-won’t read) about Watergate

          A delusion is a strong belief or conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary. The Watergate delusion, embraced by millions, is that swashbuckling Bob Woodward and the left confronted the malevolent Nixon administration as it cast a sinister pall over America and slayed it with the lance of truth, thereby saving democracy. But the actual evidence demonstrates that Watergate was not a shining example of democracy, and Bob Woodward’s place among the pantheon of journalistic immortals is a grift. One of the grand deceptions of Watergate is that Nixon’s enemies on the left razed his presidency, but it was actually his enemies on the right—the far right—who initially had the means, motive, and opportunity. And although Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein told numerous lies throughout their Watergate reporting, Woodward’s Big Lie was that he didn’t meet Alexander Haig until 1973. As The Truth About Watergate takes the reader on a guided tour of the extraordinary lies and liars of Watergate, it demonstrates that Woodward’s fabrication about Haig has seismic implications. If Woodward’s Big Lie about Haig had been exposed, then the synergistic mythologies of Bob Woodward and “Deep Throat” would have been shattered and swept away by gusts of veracity. The Washington Post has scorned prior Watergate revisionist books, like Silent Coup: The Removal of a President as a conspiracy theory, but The Truth About Watergate shows The Washington Post has fervent, utilitarian motives for banishing Silent Coup to the conspiracy theory ghetto.

        • I’m with you “ThinkAboutIt” (after-all we are on the same side) that it would be nice “if” we could trust reporters to do objective reporting, however, at this point I will never expect it. If it comes from the left, (and sometimes from the right) I will be objective in researching it. During covid, I sent factual scientific information to such sites as FOX, Breitbart, Epoch Times, Newsmax, Gateway Pundit; none of them reported what I sent. If they had researched they would have known it was right on info, but no response from them. They followed the government narrative and basically promoted the lie. I’ve caught Epoch times shilling for the Republicans in DC, when pointed out to them there was no response. Hannity, Mark Levin and Glenn Beck have reported BS info. Although Beck’s books have been excellent. (at least the ones I read). Even “America’s Truth Detector” Rush Limbaugh “would not” tell the truth about the mask that does not protect from a virus that Americans “conned” other Americans into wearing. Some punk at Walmart threatened to put me in jail because I wouldn’t wear a mask.At the VA, veterans were treated like criminals if we opposed the mask. Pretty much not reported at right wing agencies at the time it was happening.

          Michelle Malkin told the truth at CPAC and was black balled by Republican Matt Schlapp, founder of CPAC. Malkin, a great researcher and patriot has stories about how facial recognition is not accurate including Americans went to jail because facial recognition is not accurate. As well as stories about forensic science goofs by people who should have never been hired in that capacity that falsely put people in prison. No traction from major right wing news organizations.

          The first story about “graphic oxide” in vaccines came from a scientist in Spain, I sent it to all the right wing agencies listed above. No reporting on it. The only reporting on it were Stew Peters, Alex Jones, Prof Michel Chossudovsky in Canada. Same with parasites in vaccines as far as reporting by right wing agencies. A polish scientist was murdered about two weeks after he reported on what was in vaccines. The polish scientist had six vials, two were placebos. No traction in the right wing agencies mentioned above. (why placebos) Later there were reports government officials were getting the placebos. (could not verify that)

          All the stories you mention, yes they reported the event but “the devil” is always in the details. My father, WWII DAV, (1970s) shared he knew that FDR had forced us into WWII with the oil embargo of Japan. After all the media covered up that FDR was crippled as they did about Biden having memory issues.

          There is interesting information about the collapse of the Twin Towers, initially I thought it was all BS conspiracy, but after learning how corrupt the FBI and CIA are, there maybe some more devil in the details.

          Anyway, if you read this far; I like your posts and favor you as a patriot!

        • I’m not surprised! If Trump loses, the Senate and Congress will pass the US version of the Enabling Act (March 23, 1933)

  5. Mark Cuban is a devious ahole. He’s not “American First” he’s “Mark Cuban First.” Remember how favorably he view outsourcing jobs to foreign countries when he was on Shark Tank. He’s not to be trusted – ever.

Comments are closed.