NEWT SAYS THE CHENEY’S ARE SMART AND HAVE A GAME PLAN
At 9:39 on the clip below, Newt Gingrich discusses the Liz Cheney situation. He said that there is no doubt the Cheneys have a game plan, and while she could sail off into the sunset, it’s not likely.
Newt was interviewing with Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures when he said Cheney is positioning herself to possibly run as a 2024 presidential candidate if Donald Trump runs again. She would hope to skim off the RINOS or more moderate Republicans.
She could be the new Evan McMullin, hoping to destroy Donald Trump’s chances. That is how deep the hatred goes in the crowd she hangs with.
Don’t forget the Bush’s and Cheney’s never complained about Barack Obama or Joe Biden, who is destroying the country. They hate conservatives more.
Also the Cheneys, Bush’s, and McMullins come from the intelligence apparatus — the deep state — our underground rulers.
Newt ended by saying the Cheneys are “smart, they have a game plan.” That is alarming. Their level of conniving could be very powerful.
Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfTFGQsFCwU&t=570s
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
The Cheney’s are Globalist. The Globalist used the 3rd Party scam in the 1990’s to elect Clinton twice, but I seriously doubt Liz Cheney has the following to step President Trump.
The fifth column Uniparty true believers won’t rest until the country is a smoldering heap of Ozmandias ruins, plan accordingly.
Cheney is working the latest phase of the coup, to try to discredit Trump and to prevent him from resuming his presidency. It seems like a reckless, desperate act, to behave in this way, and to throw duty away. It’s too early for her to attempt a 3rd party run. Gingrich is not much of an intellect. He is just a history professor attempting to show general knowledge.
I noticed he said that morally Cheney should resign. He does not understand this is ethics, not morals.